On Monday(12th August), the Allahabad High Court adjourned the hearing in the Krishna Janmbhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute due to the incomplete exchange of documents between the litigant parties. The case is being heard by Justice Mayank Kumar Jain.
The Delhi-based activist Salek Chand Jain has filed a petition in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, seeking the right for the Jain community to worship at the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque complex in Dhar. The site, contested between Hindus and Muslims, holds historical and religious significance, and the ASI is preparing to present a survey report to the court.
![[Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute] Temple is a Protected Monument Under 1958 Act, Hindu Side Tells HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-35.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Hindu side asserts that the deity was not involved in the compromise or court decree in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute at the Allahabad High Court. They argue against the applicability of the Waqf Act and emphasize the property’s historical and religious significance. The legal battle continues.
Today (1st April): The Supreme Court declined to halt the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) study on the Bhojshala Temple and Kamal Maula Mosque complex in Madhya Pradesh. The survey aims to determine the religious nature of the site. This decision follows a directive from the Madhya Pradesh High Court and a plea to prevent Muslims from offering prayers at the complex.
The dispute at Krishna Koop in Mathura has intensified as Hindu worshipers seek permission for the ‘Basoda puja’, met with objections from the Muslim community. The Allahabad High Court is considering the plea, emphasizing the historical and religious significance of the site. The next hearing is scheduled for April 1.