The Himachal Pradesh High Court Set aside a ruling mandating the state to refund over Rs. 280 crore to Adani Power Limited for two hydro-electric projects. The court found that the award to Brakel Corporation was secured through misrepresentation, rendering them ineligible for the refund. Adani’s claim was also rejected due to lack of finalized agreement with the state.
The Supreme Court collegium, led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, recommended the elevation of high court judges N Kotiswar Singh and R Mahadevan to the Supreme Court. The collegium also recommended new Chief Justices for eight high courts to enhance diversity and representation from marginalized communities. This move aims to strengthen the judiciary and ensure diverse representation.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court criticized a civil court judge for issuing a coercive order without prior notice, emphasizing the violation of legal principles and fundamental rights. The judge apologized, citing workload and infrastructure issues but was warned that expeditiousness must not overlook legal requirements. The High Court highlighted the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to legal procedures.
A Constitutional Court cannot fix a timeframe for the speaker of the State legislative assembly to decide the issue of resignation tendered by the members of Legislative Assembly, the Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled.
The Supreme Court of India suspended the refund of water cess to power firms in Himachal Pradesh, overturning a previous ruling by the High Court. This impacts hydroelectric projects in the region and aims to address legalities around the imposition and refund of water cess. The dispute will be heard by the Supreme Court in July.
On Monday(13th May), Supreme Court seeks clarification from Himachal Pradesh High Court Registrar on non-elevation of two senior district judges, following formal grievance. Judges claim rightful promotions unjustly bypassed.
Controversy surrounds the appointment of Himachal Pradesh High Court judges, as two district judges challenge the decision in the Supreme Court. Chirag Bhanu Singh and Arvind Malhotra, expressing discontent over alleged favoritism, claim oversight despite their seniority in Solan and Bilaspur districts. They have petitioned the Supreme Court to review the appointments.
On Friday(26th April), The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ordered Rakesh Sharma’s participation in a corruption probe involving MLA Ashish Sharma and scheduled proceedings for May 24. Allegations include financial misdeeds and destabilizing the state government. The political landscape remains tense, with upcoming bypolls and reduced Congress party strength. The investigation continues amidst political turmoil.
The Supreme Court has temporaily halted the transfer of Kangra SP Shalini Agnihotri, addressing concerns about the security of complainant Nishant Sharma. The court directed that Agnihotri not be involved in Sharma’s security arrangements. This move aims to ensure fair consideration of Sharma’s grievances and prevent misuse of power.
Today(on 20th April), Himachal Pradesh High Court has issued a notice to BJP leader Harsh Mahajan in response to a petition filed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi challenging the Rajya Sabha elections. This comes after Singhvi contested the “draw of lots” method used to determine the outcome of the elections, resulting in Mahajan’s victory. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on May 23, 2024.
