CJI Sanjiv Khanna: “PIL Against TDS System Not Maintainable Under Article 32, High Court Option Allowed”

Today, On 24th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay challenging the constitutionality of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions. The petition argued that TDS imposes undue administrative and financial burdens on taxpayers. However, the court rejected these concerns, emphasizing the importance of TDS in ensuring tax compliance. This decision reinforces the legal validity of the current TDS framework.

[Badlapur’s Kindergarten School Assault] Maharashtra Education Officer Challenges Suspension

Today, On 27th August, Maharashtra Education Officer Balasaheb Rakshe challenged his suspension in relation to the Badlapur sexual assault case before the Bombay High Court. Rakshe, responsible for primary schools, argued that he had no oversight of pre-primary schools. The case involved the sexual assault of two young girls, leading to public outcry and protests.

Centre Asks Delhi High Court to Form High-Level Committee for Delhi Airport Roof Collapse

A high-level committee, established today by the Union Ministry of Civil Aviation, will investigate the roof collapse at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport. The government also directed airport operators to conduct third-party audits and thorough evaluations of airport buildings annually. The Delhi High Court closed the public interest litigation following the Centre’s response and measures taken.

Drunk-Driving| Woman HR Consultant’s Bail Denied in Fatal Mercedes Crash

Yesterday, On 26th June, A Nagpur woman, Ritu Maloo, is denied bail by the Bombay High Court after her intoxicated driving led to a fatal collision with a scooter, resulting in two deaths. The court highlighted her lack of remorse and emphasized the serious consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol. Maloo’s bail request was denied due to the gravity of the charges and her attempt to evade responsibility.

Gauhati High Court Acquits Man After 21 Years, Citing Unsigned Confession Insufficiency

The Gauhati High Court acquitted a man after 21 years, citing the insufficiency of an unsigned confession. The Court noted that a confession statement, as per Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), must be signed by the magistrate who recorded it to be considered valid.