X Corp’s affidavit to the Delhi High Court argues that the government’s blocking of the ‘Hindutva Watch’ account was disproportionate and lacked documented reasons, violating fair hearing rights. The court acknowledged the overreach of the blocking order under the IT Act, emphasizing the need for targeted action rather than account-wide bans.
A court in Ajmer has acquitted six individuals accused of raising provocative slogans against BJP leader Nupur Sharma. The slogans were in response to derogatory comments made by Sharma about the Prophet. This led to Chishti’s arrest as the main accused in July 2022. Following his acquittal, Chishti expressed gratitude, stating, “Justice has been served in my case.”
A Special Court in Bengaluru on thursday (11th July) granted interim anticipatory bail to BJP MLA Y Bharath Shetty for alleged hate speech against Rahul Gandhi. The judge directed Kavoor police to release Shetty on bail upon posting a Rs 1 lakh personal bond with one surety. The court adjourned the matter to July 16 for the prosecution to file objections.
The Karnataka High Court, on Friday(June 21), temporarily halted criminal proceedings against three organizers of a Chennai event where controversial remarks on Sanatana Dharma were made by DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin. Justice Krishna S Dixit’s decision offers interim relief until the court hears the organizers’ petition to dismiss the case.
Today (14th May): The Supreme Court rejected BJP leader H Raja’s plea to dismiss criminal cases against him for controversial comments on Periyar and women. The court stressed the decline in political discourse and the need for caution in public statements by politicians. The charges stem from Raja’s derogatory remarks, and the legal proceedings will continue as the court upheld the accountability of political speech.
The Supreme Court Today (May 14th) dismissed a petition seeking directions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) for action against the alleged hate speeches delivered by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during the ongoing Lok Sabha elections.
Today, On 10th May, The Calcutta High Court prohibited discussing Murshidabad’s demographics in relation to the Ram Navami violence, aiming to prevent inflammatory statements and maintain communal harmony. The order, amid tensions, forbids comments on population and religious data to avoid inciting unrest. The court is overseeing an NIA investigation and deferred the hearing until June 13 for a comprehensive report.
Today(on 9th May), A petition filed in the Supreme Court urges the Election Commission of India to address hate speeches during election campaigns, particularly by BJP members. Specific instances of hate speech are highlighted, and the petition emphasizes the need for the ECI to take action to uphold free and fair elections and maintain the integrity of the process.
Today, On 29th April, The Supreme Court extended the stay on hate speech proceedings against Tamil Nadu BJP Chief K Annamalai, reflecting ongoing legal deliberations and the complexity of balancing free speech with legal constraints. The case involves allegations of hate speech made during a political rally, with the next hearing scheduled for September 9. This high-profile case has sparked significant interest due to its potential impact on political discourse boundaries and legal regulations.
Raj Thackeray | The Bombay High Court dismissed allegations of inciting violence against Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) leader Raj Thackeray due to a lack of evidence for provocative speech or instigation. The court criticized the lower court’s decision and emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in legal proceedings regarding cases of alleged incitement and public disorder.
