Today (7th March): Justice BV Nagarathna recused herself from hearing a plea challenging Harsh Vardhan Lodha’s leadership in the MP Birla Group, causing a setback in the scheduled hearing. This follows legal battles over the validity of Priyamvada Devi Birla’s will, influencing the group’s leadership. High Court rulings and appeals from both sides indicate a complex and ongoing legal dispute.
The Supreme Court clarified that Reliance Infrastructure seeks reimbursement, not damages, from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation for the costs of trains used on the airport metro line. DMRC challenged the arbitral award favoring Reliance, claiming the termination notice was illegal. Reliance emphasized it was seeking the cost of trains, not damages, during the proceedings.
Andhra Pradesh High Court Awaits Verdict on Naidu’s Plea in Skill Development Scam: A Deep Dive into the Legal Battle. The Andhra Pradesh High Court, under the purview of Justice K. Sreenivas Reddy, has reserved its judgment concerning the plea of former Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu. Naidu is seeking to quash the case against […]
