Today, on 21st October, the Supreme Court upheld the summons to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a defamation case regarding Prime Minister Modi’s academic qualifications, rejecting Kejriwal’s appeal. The court referenced a similar prior dismissal involving AAP MP Sanjay Singh, stating the complaint aimed to protect Gujarat University’s reputation from alleged defamatory remarks.
Justice B.R. Gavai highlighted the critical role of judicial ethics and integrity at a conference in Gujarat, stressing that a judge’s conduct affects public trust. He warned that resigning to contest elections could harm perceptions of impartiality and emphasized the judiciary’s independence from other branches to maintain credibility and prevent justice delays.
The Gujarat High Court has announced free medical treatment for judges, judicial officers, and employees after signing agreements with four government hospitals. The move aims to provide specialty and super-specialty services, complementing the existing High Court Medical Facility, which previously lacked these advanced medical services for its staff and their families.
The Gujarat High Court has directed the State government to address the upgrading of government-aided law colleges to comply with Bar Council of India (BCI) standards. The court’s decision follows a petition highlighting the financial strain on these institutions due to hefty fines imposed for non-compliance, leading to declining admissions and a rise in self-financed colleges.
The Gujarat High Court has stayed the suspension of a GNLU student, reinstating him to the hostel. The court’s decision underscores the importance of due process in disciplinary actions, especially when academic schedules clash with inquiries. This ruling highlights students’ rights and the necessity for universities to adhere to UGC directives.
![[Demolitions in Somnath] "If Authorities in Contempt, Will Ask Them to Restore Structures": SC Declines To Halt Demolitions, Seeks Gujarat's Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-15.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today (Oct 4) said if it finds that authorities in Gujarat acted in contempt of its order on demolition of properties, it will ask them to restore the structures. A bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan was hearing a plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged violation of the apex court’s September 17 order which had said that there shall be no demolition of properties, including those accused of crimes, across the country without its permission.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Wrongful Demolitions Warrant Compensation; Officials Should Not Be Shielded from Accountability": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Watch-What-is-Bulldozer-Justice-And-Why-Does-the-SC-Want-Guidelines-Against-It_-on-News9-Plus.png?resize=447%2C348&ssl=1)
Today, On 1st October, The Supreme Court reserved its judgment in the “bulldozer justice” case, highlighting public safety’s primacy. It mandated the removal of any religious structures, such as temples or dargahs, that encroach on essential infrastructure. The court’s directives ensure equitable application of anti-encroachment measures, reinforcing India’s secular principles and addressing unauthorized constructions uniformly.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court has halted today (17th Sept) bulldozer demolitions across India until at least October 1, except on public roads, water bodies, or railway lines with court permission. This follows a plea challenging the demolition of a family’s house in Gujarat. The Court aims to establish clear demolition guidelines nationwide. Solicitor General Mehta objected, but the Court emphasized the need for regulation.
Today, On 14th August, The Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat government for appealing a High Court ruling favoring a sweeper, questioning the decision and demanding details about the officials involved. This stern stance emphasizes adherence to judicial rulings impacting lower-level employees’ livelihoods, stressing responsible government decision-making. Additionally, it warns against unnecessary delays or challenges, reinforcing the importance of justice and efficiency in governance.
![[Defamation Case] Saket Court Suspends Medha Patkar’s Sentence For Remarks Against Delhi L-G VK Saxena](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-6-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th July, the Saket Court suspended activist Medha Patkar’s sentence for defaming Delhi L-G VK Saxena and granted her bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000. The court also issued a notice to the Delhi L-G, seeking his response by September 4. Patkar had been sentenced to five months in jail and ordered to pay damages but has now been granted bail.