Why is the President of SCBA Not Protesting Non-Appointment of Women Judges? : Questions Senior Advocate Indira Jaising

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising raised serious concerns over the non-appointment of women judges to the Supreme Court of India. She questioned why the President of the SCBA has not protested, highlighting that 28 male judges were appointed since 2021.

Indira Jaisingh Slams Supreme Court Collegium for Ignoring Women Judges Since 2021: “Does Wisdom Lie Only with Men?”

Senior Advocate Indira Jaisingh criticised the Supreme Court Collegium, pointing out that since 2021, after Justices Hima Kohli, B.V. Nagarathna, and Bela Trivedi were appointed, not a single woman has been recommended, asking, “Does wisdom lie only with men?”

Centre to Ignore Justice BV Nagarathna’s Dissent: “Will Proceed with Justice Vipul Pancholi’s Elevation”

Centre has decided to move ahead with the elevation of Justice Vipul Pancholi, despite Justice BV Nagarathna’s strong opposition. Sources said the government will proceed with the appointment, making clear that her dissent will not stall the process.

Supreme Court Collegium Considers Restricting Judges’ Relatives’ Appointments in High Courts: ‘Could Open Doors for First-Generation Lawyers’

The Supreme Court Collegium is considering a proposal to limit the appointment of judges’ relatives to judicial positions. This move aims to promote fairness and inclusivity in the judiciary, creating opportunities for first-generation lawyers. Experts believe it could enhance diversity and improve representation from underrepresented communities in constitutional courts. The step reflects a growing emphasis on merit-based selections in India’s judicial system.

‘Comments On PM Modi’s Degree’: Supreme Court Upholds Summons To Arvind Kejriwal In Defamation Case

Today, on 21st October, the Supreme Court upheld the summons to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a defamation case regarding Prime Minister Modi’s academic qualifications, rejecting Kejriwal’s appeal. The court referenced a similar prior dismissal involving AAP MP Sanjay Singh, stating the complaint aimed to protect Gujarat University’s reputation from alleged defamatory remarks.

“Criminal Contempt Application is Frivolous & Vexatious”: Allahabad HC Dismisses Petition in Alleged Bias Case Against Gujarat Chief Justice

The Allahabad High Court dismissed advocate Arun Mishra’s plea alleging bias against Gujarat HC Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal, deeming it frivolous and without merit. The Court emphasized that contempt proceedings require Advocate General consent and clarified that Mishra’s claims did not constitute criminal contempt, underscoring the need to prevent frivolous petitions.

BREAKING| Rajkot Game Zone Tragedy: Gujarat High Court Declares Fatal Fire a ‘Man-Made Disaster’

Today, On 26th May, The Gujarat High Court deemed the Rajkot Game Zone fire a man-made disaster due to negligence and lack of safety measures, resulting in multiple fatalities. The court called for stricter regulations and emphasized the urgent need for improved safety standards in public places. The tragedy prompted the court to address the proliferation of unapproved gaming zones and recreational facilities.