The Supreme Court of India annulled a condition imposed by the Gujarat Government that required a murder convict to “behave decently” for two years as a prerequisite for remission. The Court deemed the condition arbitrary and vague, violating constitutional rights, while upholding a second condition related to criminal conduct but emphasizing adherence to natural justice in revocation processes.
The Gujarat government defended its demolition activities in Gir Somnath before the Supreme Court, asserting the need to remove illegal encroachments on public land. In response to a legal challenge, the government emphasized adherence to legal procedures, while the petitioner accused authorities of targeting Muslim sites unlawfully. The case was adjourned for further review.
![[Godhra Train Burning Case] "No Adjournment on Next Date": Supreme Court Schedules Hearing for January 15](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-18-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th September, the Supreme Court scheduled hearings for January 15 on the 2002 Godhra train burning case, where the Gujarat government seeks to reinstate death penalties for 11 convicts previously commuted to life imprisonment. The court denied further adjournments, emphasizing timely proceedings and understanding each individual case’s details.
![[Bilkis Bano Case] "We Are Satisfied, There's No Error": SC Rejects Gujarat Govt's Plea Seeking Review of Verdict Over Certain Observations](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Convicts-of-Bilkis-Bano-Case-Appeal-to-Supreme-Court-Over-Challenge-to-Early-Release-Plea.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th September, the Supreme Court rejected the Gujarat government’s plea to review its prior decision on the Bilkis Bano case, which involved the early release of 11 convicts in a 2002 gangrape and murder. The court upheld its remarks on the state’s actions, reaffirming systemic issues related to the Gujarat riots.
Today, On 12th September, The Supreme Court criticized the practice of demolishing properties as punishment, emphasizing that allegations of involvement in a crime do not justify such actions. It warned against undermining the rule of law and stressed the need for due legal process. The court issued a notice to the Gujarat government to respond and ruled against the demolition of a specific house.
Today, On 3rd September, The Gujarat High Court criticized the state for a 5-year appeal delay and ordered an inquiry to hold officials accountable. The court warned against casual approaches, emphasized the importance of acknowledging indefensible orders, and advised advocates on discretion in court. (Word count: 43)
Today, On 2nd September, The Supreme Court initiated a suo moto case regarding delayed compensation distribution by tribunals. Five High Courts have been asked to respond. A retired Gujarat judge brought attention to Rs. 2,000 crores in unpaid compensation. Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora is appointed as Amicus Curiae, and the Supreme Court seeks responses to address the issue.
The Supreme Court has today issued a notice to the Gujarat Government regarding former police officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s appeal against his conviction and life sentence in a 1990 custodial death case. Bhatt, along with other officers, was found guilty of custodial torture following communal riots. The case will be heard alongside related appeals.
Today, On 14th August, The Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat government for appealing a High Court ruling favoring a sweeper, questioning the decision and demanding details about the officials involved. This stern stance emphasizes adherence to judicial rulings impacting lower-level employees’ livelihoods, stressing responsible government decision-making. Additionally, it warns against unnecessary delays or challenges, reinforcing the importance of justice and efficiency in governance.
Today(on 10th July), The Supreme Court paused a Gujarat High Court directive requiring the state government to reclaim 108 hectares of grazing land allotted to Adani Ports in 2005, providing relief to APSEZ. The bench, led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, issued a notice to the Gujarat government following APSEZ’s appeal to stay the High Court’s order.
