The Gauhati High Court held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29 read with Rule 21(e) must be independent and reasoned. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury ruled it cannot serve as coercion during investigation or rely solely on interim reports.
The Gujarat High Court held that GST input tax credit on leasehold rights is admissible, ruling it is not barred under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court clarified the transaction was not construction and found Section 17(5)(d) misinterpreted.
The Allahabad High Court held that the Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act lacks power to remand matters, annulling refund-related remand orders and relying on its earlier ruling in Anand & Anand vs. Principal Commissioner of CGST prohibiting such action.
The Karnataka High Court ruled in Huawei Technologies India Private Limited vs. State of Karnataka that salaries paid to expatriate employees are not liable to IGST under reverse charge when a genuine employer-employee relationship exists, rejecting the revenue’s manpower supply service classification claim.
The Kerala High Court quashed composite GST show cause notices issued across multiple financial years, including to actress Honey Rose, holding that authorities cannot club different assessment years in a single notice under the CGST and SGST Acts, 2017.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that inseparable goods essential to services form a composite supply, and billing methods cannot alter tax classification under GST law. Judges said chemicals and mud engineering were naturally bundled for safe drilling operations.
The Rajasthan High Court set aside a GST appeal after finding that the same Additional Commissioner acted as both inspecting and appellate authority, holding such dual roles under Section 107 of the GST Act violated principles of fairness and natural justice.
The Gujarat High Court ruled that delays in filing GST appeals cannot be condoned beyond the statutory time limit, even under Article 226 writ jurisdiction. Justices A.S. Supehia and Pranav Trivedi dismissed the petition, citing excessive and impermissible delay.
The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to Himesh Foods Pvt Ltd, staying a Rs 57.29 crore GST demand and penalties. The Division Bench noted a coordinate bench had earlier extended similar protection to Hindustan Coca-Cola in a comparable GST dispute.
