BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | “We Have Always Said Judicial Activism Cannot Become Judicial Terrorism”: CJI Gavai Blasts SG Mehta

Today, On 21st August, in the Presidential Reference Hearing, CJI Gavai strongly cautioned SG Mehta, stressing that while judicial activism has its role, it must never cross the line into judicial terrorism, reiterating the constitutional limits of judicial power in governance.

Assent To Bills | Day 2 | ‘Power of Article 142 Cannot Violate the Basic Structure of the Constitution’: AG Slams Supreme Court Over Presidential Reference

Today, On 19th August, Day 2 of the Presidential Reference hearing on assent to bills, Attorney General R. Venkataramani argued that the “power of Article 142 cannot violate the Basic Structure of the Constitution” and cannot allow deemed assent by the judiciary.

BREAKING| Presidential Reference Case| “Will Only Be Expressing Our View on Law, Not Pronouncing Judgment in TN Case”: CJI Gavai

Today, On 19th August, Presidential Reference Case, Chief Justice B.R. Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court will only be expressing its view on the law and not delivering a judgment in the Tamil Nadu case while hearing objections from Tamil Nadu and Kerala.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | “Reference Bench Can Give an Opinion, But Cannot Overrule Judgment”: Supreme Court

Today, On 19th August, The Supreme Court, during the Presidential Reference hearing, clarified that a reference bench has the power to express its opinion on a judgment, but it does not have the authority to overrule an earlier judgment.

Supreme Court Steps In: Tamil Nadu vs. Governor Verdict Sparks Judicial Overreach Debate

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Tamil Nadu’s case against its Governor sets strict limits on gubernatorial discretion. Legal experts warn this could mark a turning point toward judicial overreach in India’s federal system.

BREAKING | Centre Likely to File Review Petition Against Supreme Court Order on Governor and President’s Assent to State Bills

The Centre may move Supreme Court to review its ruling on delays in Governor and President assent to State laws. The MHA argues the judgement impacts constitutional procedures and timelines.

ANALYSIS | Supreme Court Says State Can Move SC if Prez Withholds Assent on Bill Sent by Guv: “No One Can Block Bills Without Accountability”

In a game-changing verdict, Supreme Court says states can move court if the President withholds assent on bills. Governors and President can’t delay or deny state bills without clear, legal reasons anymore!

Supreme Court Prescribes Timelines for Governors on Bills: Why It’s Not a Constitutional Amendment?

The Supreme Court of India has issued a landmark ruling setting clear timelines for Governors to act on state Bills under Article 200, aiming to curb delays and uphold constitutional accountability.

RN Ravi Should Resign and Go Home: Ex Governor Margaret Alva After Supreme Court Slams Tamil Nadu Governor

Supreme Court calls Governor RN Ravi’s delay on 10 bills “illegal” and orders them passed. Margaret Alva hails verdict, says Governors are not dictators.

Supreme Court Explains Governor’s Role in Lawmaking: “No Delay or Veto Allowed, Constitution Must Be Respected”

The Supreme Court Today (April 8) strongly criticized Governors for blocking elected state governments for political reasons. It reminded them to respect the people’s will and uphold the Constitution. Court ruled that Governors must act quickly on State bills and cannot block or delay them for political reasons. It declared Tamil Nadu Governor’s actions illegal and fixed strict timelines for future decisions.