Today, On 21st August, in the Presidential Reference Hearing, CJI Gavai strongly cautioned SG Mehta, stressing that while judicial activism has its role, it must never cross the line into judicial terrorism, reiterating the constitutional limits of judicial power in governance.
Today, On 19th August, Day 2 of the Presidential Reference hearing on assent to bills, Attorney General R. Venkataramani argued that the “power of Article 142 cannot violate the Basic Structure of the Constitution” and cannot allow deemed assent by the judiciary.
Today, On 19th August, Presidential Reference Case, Chief Justice B.R. Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court will only be expressing its view on the law and not delivering a judgment in the Tamil Nadu case while hearing objections from Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
Today, On 19th August, The Supreme Court, during the Presidential Reference hearing, clarified that a reference bench has the power to express its opinion on a judgment, but it does not have the authority to overrule an earlier judgment.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Tamil Nadu’s case against its Governor sets strict limits on gubernatorial discretion. Legal experts warn this could mark a turning point toward judicial overreach in India’s federal system.
The Centre may move Supreme Court to review its ruling on delays in Governor and President assent to State laws. The MHA argues the judgement impacts constitutional procedures and timelines.
In a game-changing verdict, Supreme Court says states can move court if the President withholds assent on bills. Governors and President can’t delay or deny state bills without clear, legal reasons anymore!
The Supreme Court of India has issued a landmark ruling setting clear timelines for Governors to act on state Bills under Article 200, aiming to curb delays and uphold constitutional accountability.
Supreme Court calls Governor RN Ravi’s delay on 10 bills “illegal” and orders them passed. Margaret Alva hails verdict, says Governors are not dictators.
The Supreme Court Today (April 8) strongly criticized Governors for blocking elected state governments for political reasons. It reminded them to respect the people’s will and uphold the Constitution. Court ruled that Governors must act quickly on State bills and cannot block or delay them for political reasons. It declared Tamil Nadu Governor’s actions illegal and fixed strict timelines for future decisions.
