![[Lawyers vs. Judge] Clash Erupts in Ghaziabad Courtroom; Police Use Lathi Charge to Control Situation](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-5-6.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (30th Oct): The Supreme Court Bar Association condemns police brutality against advocates in Ghaziabad, demanding accountability from the judiciary and law enforcement. They call for an independent inquiry, dismissal of responsible officials, and implementation of protective measures for advocates. This incident highlights the need for systemic reforms and collaboration between legal professionals.
A petition in the Allahabad High Court seeks to restrain Yati Narsinghanand from making derogatory comments about Prophet Muhammad and the Quran, requesting the removal of his “hate speech” from social media. The petitioners argue that his actions jeopardize societal stability and call for legal action against him due to his history of hate speech.
![[Mayur Vihar Tragedy] "They Think Doing Work is a Crime": HC Criticizes MCD Over Death of Woman & Child in Waterlogged Drain](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/shared-image-4-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th August, The Delhi High Court criticized the Municipal Corporation of Delhi for negligence after a tragic incident of a mother and son falling into an open drain. The court demanded video evidence, questioned jurisdictional issues, and scrutinized the lack of maintenance and oversight, prompting the need for immediate actions to prevent further tragedies.
The Delhi High Court approved an expansion of jurisdiction for Civil Judges in Delhi District Courts, allowing them to hear higher monetary disputes. This move aims to increase efficiency, reduce case backlogs, and align Delhi’s courts with neighboring areas. The decision reflects a strategic approach to judicial management and is expected to improve the overall responsiveness and efficiency of the court system in Delhi.
Today (5th April),The Allahabad High Court warns judicial officers not allowing video conferencing, emphasizing its importance, especially for witnesses outside the district. Non-compliance may lead to disciplinary action. The court orders reports on video conferencing facilities and virtual hearings. It instructs the government counsel to address the lack of facilities for prosecution witnesses outside the district.
Today(12th March), The CBI has made progress in recovering fraudulent exam answer sheets from Ghaziabad. Anindya Mitra, representing job recipients, questioned CBI’s actions at Calcutta High Court, raising doubts about the investigation and the consequences faced by those implicated. The court also pondered the logistical challenges of examining 23 lakh OMR sheets. The next hearing is scheduled for Wednesday.
