The Supreme Court Today (May 6th) during a mentioning by the Supreme Court Bar Association-SCBA, has clarified that its previous order directing a minimum of 1/3rd of seats in the Executive Committee for women is on an “experimental basis”.
![[BREAKING] One-Third of SCBA Posts Reserved for Women: Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-38.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (2nd May): The Supreme Court directed that one-third of SCBA posts must be reserved for women. For the current year, three executive members, two senior executive members, and the treasurer must be women. This aims to promote gender inclusivity and diversity within the association. The directive builds on a plea for gender representation. Elections for the 2024-25 term are scheduled for May 16th.
The Delhi High Court, led by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, acknowledged domestic violence concerns among female police officers, emphasizing the need for targeted support. The court overturned a judgment dismissing charges against a man accused of cruelty to his police officer wife, challenging stereotypes about police officers’ invulnerability and calling for greater gender sensitivity in judicial education.
Today(on 26th April), The Delhi High Court has directed the Defence Ministry to decide the plea for women’s inclusion in the Armed Forces through CDS exam within 8 weeks. The plea was submitted by Advocate Kush Kalra and highlights the issue of gender discrimination in the recruitment process, emphasizing the urgency of ensuring equal opportunities.
Today (22nd April): The Supreme Court affirmed the Constitutional duty to provide Child Care Leave (CCL) to mothers of children with disabilities for equal opportunities in the workforce. Denying CCL violates constitutional rights. The court directed the Himachal Pradesh Government to review its CCL policy and form a committee for implementation by July 31, 2024.
Today (15th April): The Supreme Court of India has allowed women officers in the Indian Army to legally challenge a newly introduced promotion policy, specifically the mandatory two-year higher course requirement which they argue hampers their career progression. This decision provides a formal legal avenue for addressing grievances against the new policy, advancing gender equality within the Army.
New Delhi: On Monday (8th April): The Supreme Court questioned the Central Government’s resistance to granting permanent commission to women officers in the Indian Coast Guard, emphasizing the need for gender equality in all branches of the armed forces. The Court criticized the Coast Guard for not complying with directives and emphasized women’s capability to serve in defense roles, advocating for equal opportunities.
Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, criticized the limited representation of women in Bar Councils and Associations, describing it as an entrenched “old boys club”. He called for a more supportive environment for women to participate and succeed in elections, stressing the shared responsibility of all stakeholders and encouraging women advocates to contest elections and take on positions of responsibility.
The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta criticized the approach of viewing women as mere statistics in the quest for gender equality. Mehta voiced his concerns against the mere numerical increase of women in legal positions, emphasizing the importance of merit over tokenism. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta voiced his concerns against the mere numerical increase of women […]