The power to grant furlough is usually with the government (executive), but in Delhi, the High Court is hearing a case about this rule. Furlough is a temporary leave from prison given as a right to well-behaved prisoners, while parole is granted in special cases based on need. The Delhi rule is different because the court, not just the government, plays a role in these decisions. This case is important as it may change how furlough is granted in Delhi.
Today, On 24th January, The Centre informed the Supreme Court that Shraddananda is seeking a direction for the President to decide on his mercy plea. The plea is related to his conviction, and the petitioner is requesting the President’s intervention. The Centre explained this during a virtual hearing in the apex court. The Court will now consider the matter for further proceedings.
Vikas Yadav, serving life for the 2002 murder of Nitish Katara, seeks a three-week furlough from the Delhi High Court. His plea cites 22 years of custody, a clean record, and deprivation of social ties. Previous furlough requests were denied due to reported misconduct during imprisonment, challenging his rehabilitation claims.
The Delhi High Court has directed lawyers to avoid unnecessary adjournments and to file timely status reports in bail, parole, and similar cases. The circular emphasizes the importance of expeditious case disposal and efficient judicial functioning. It mandates the submission of status reports and requests prompt compliance with court orders for smooth judicial proceedings.