The Delhi High Court on Monday(25th Nov) criticized the government’s funding dispute over a flyover repair, emphasizing that safety must come first. Concerns arose about accountability if the structure were to collapse, as both the TTDC and PWD shifted responsibility. The court expressed frustration about ongoing bureaucratic delays impacting public safety and infrastructure financing.
On Tuesday(2nd April), The Delhi High Court recently concluded discussions regarding DCPCR’s petition against LG V K Saxena, raising concerns about funding cessation. Justice Prasad oversaw the case, with DCPCR choosing not to pursue the petition. A second petitioner’s withdrawal indicated a shift within DCPCR. The court’s decision brings procedural aspects and challenges facing bodies like DCPCR into focus.
