Today, On 5th August, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the use of body parts as political symbols, noting the plea’s specific aim at the Indian National Congress hand symbol. The court emphasized the Election Commission’s authority in symbol allocation, affirming the importance of symbols in the electoral process and judicial restraint in such matters, while upholding established norms.
The Bombay High Court today dismissed a PIL challenging Maharashtra’s ‘Ladki Bahin Yojana’ scheme, stating it benefits women without discrimination. The court deemed the scheme a valid policy decision beyond judicial interference. The PIL’s arguments about political motivation and discriminatory nature were disregarded, and the court emphasized the scheme’s social welfare intent.
Supreme Court judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna criticized the overstepping of roles by governors in India and their inactivity, reflecting poorly on the constitutional position of the governor. She emphasized the importance of fraternity and advocated for a focus on federalism, fundamental rights, and principled governance to strengthen Indian constitutionalism. She is set to become the Chief Justice of India in September 2027.
The Chief Justice of India, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, today refused to entertain a petition seeking judicial directives to combat superstition, emphasizing that education, societal reform, and legislative action are essential. The Court stressed that courts cannot address all societal problems and that the responsibility of addressing such issues lies with civil society and democratic institutions.
Today, On 29th July, A student from Delhi appealed to Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, expressing anguish over recent student deaths caused by flooding in coaching center basements. The student highlighted poor infrastructure, negligence by officials, and the necessity to protect students’ rights. The incident sparked arrests, debate in Parliament, and demands for justice and compensation.
![[Mon Killings Case] SC Issues Notice to Defence Ministry on Nagaland's Plea to Prosecute 30 Army Personnel](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-17T152750.747.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 16th July, The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, issued a notice to the Defence Ministry in response to Nagaland’s plea to prosecute 30 Army personnel involved in the Mon killings. This comes after the Central government denied prosecution sanction under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. The incident, which sparked public outcry, occurred during a flawed military operation in December 2021.
Today, On 12th July, The Supreme Court granted interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal in the money laundering case linked to the liquor policy controversy. Kejriwal is barred from visiting the Chief Minister’s Office and interacting with witnesses. The Court referred the legality of his arrest to a larger bench and highlighted the importance of judicial scrutiny in such cases.
The Delhi High Court upheld a law mandating 50% coverage of health warnings on pan masala packaging to inform consumers about its harmful effects. The ruling aimed to promote public health and increase consumer awareness. The Court dismissed a plea by a pan masala company, emphasizing the regulation’s proportionate nature and its alignment with public interest.
A group of Indian doctors with foreign medical degrees have petitioned the Supreme Court, challenging the denial of stipends during their internships in India. The court has sought a response from the government and the National Medical Commission. The petition highlights the disparities faced by foreign-trained medical graduates compared to those educated in India.
The Supreme Court of India addressed the inhumane conditions in Indian prisons, urging states and union territories to take comprehensive measures to improve inmate well-being. The Court emphasized the protection of prisoners’ fundamental rights and directed officials to submit detailed affidavits addressing capacity, logistics, and enhancement efforts. The apex court set a deadline for these submissions and called for urgent action.