![[Saamana Article on Cash For Votes] Eknath Shinde Demands Immediate Apology from Sanjay Raut| Legal Notice Issued with 3-Day Deadline](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-20-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Eknath Shinde, Maharashtra Chief Minister, sent a legal notice to Sanjay Raut, alleging defamatory statements in Saamna newspaper regarding Lok Sabha elections. Shinde demands an apology within three days, warning of criminal and civil proceedings if not met. Raut responded playfully, as the tension between the two parties continues to escalate.
On Friday(17th May), The Supreme Court has stayed an Andhra Pradesh district court’s order that restricted YS Sharmila from commenting on the YSR Congress Party and its members regarding the killing of her uncle, Y S Vivekananda Reddy. The apex court viewed the injunction as a violation of the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant stressed the necessity of safeguarding free speech, especially for journalists and the media. He emphasized the crucial link between freedom of speech and leading a dignified life, and the courts’ disapproval of attempts to curtail this right. The event also featured discussions on protecting the media’s rights within constitutional limits.
Today(on 10th May), The Supreme Court addressed Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to consolidate cases over his Sanatana Dharma comments. Notices were issued to states and complainants after a petition amendment. The Court’s consistent stance on Stalin’s remarks highlights the legal scrutiny and widespread repercussions, emphasizing responsible speech and the need for social harmony.
The Supreme Court of India has granted an interim stay on the imprisonment of retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar, following a contempt of court proceeding initiated by cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni. The case is set for a detailed hearing on May 3. The Madras High Court found Kumar guilty of contempt for derogatory comments.
The Supreme Court of India Today(on 8th April), reinstated bail for YouTuber ‘Sattai’ Durai Murugan, accused of making derogatory remarks against Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin. The court emphasized the importance of balancing individual rights and public order, setting a precedent for protecting freedom of expression and highlighting the need for careful consideration in cases involving allegations made on digital platforms like YouTube.
The Supreme Court set aside the order against Bloomberg’s report on Zee Entertainment, which alleged a $241 million accounting irregularity. It emphasized the need for a more thorough assessment of facts in such cases, nullifying the injunction. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the prior decisions and stressed the necessity for a proper evaluation before granting an injunction.
The Supreme Court of India emphasized the right to dissent and freedom of speech, stating that criticizing government actions is not a crime. The court urged law enforcement agencies to understand and respect citizens’ rights to express dissent, stressing the need to evaluate statements based on their impact on reasonable individuals, rather than hypersensitive interpretations.
In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, led by Justice Rakesh Kainthla, delineated the boundaries of freedom of speech in the context of defamation. The case involved Jagat Singh Negi, a State Revenue, Horticulture, and Tribal Development Minister and Congress leader, who filed a complaint against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Surat Singh […]
A Legacy of Landmark Judgments and Constitutional Wisdom by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, who retired on December 25, 2023, after serving an impactful tenure of 6 years and 10 months at the Supreme Court of India, has been a pivotal figure in shaping contemporary Indian jurisprudence. His retirement marks the end […]