Molestation Case| Mumbai Court Summons Prithvi Shaw

Today, On 30th April, A Mumbai court summoned cricketer Prithvi Shaw following allegations made by social media influencer Sapna Gill. The case stems from accusations of molestation at a pub, prompting legal action and media scrutiny. The court is reviewing evidence, including video footage, and the next hearing is scheduled for June 6, reflecting ongoing legal developments.

Karnataka HC Criticizes Election Speeches as ‘Abysmal’| DK Shivakumar Case

Today, On 25th April,The Karnataka High Court criticized declining standards of political discourse during election campaigns in the context of DK Shivakumar’s case. The court granted interim relief to Shivakumar, criticizing the FIR against him for breaching the Model Code of Conduct. It also emphasized the need for caution in political speeches to avoid legal issues.

Hymen Rupture Not Essential in All Penetrative Assaults: Gauhati HC in POCSO Case

The Gauhati High Court, in a significant ruling related to a POCSO case, emphasized that hymen rupture is not a necessary indication in all instances of penetrative assault. This decision marks a shift in understanding and evaluating evidence in such cases, focusing on the broader context of assault rather than physical signs alone. The judgment highlights the importance of thoughtful evaluation and a thorough approach when dealing with cases of sexual violence governed by the POCSO Act.

HC Seeks ED Evidence for Tahir Hussain’s PMLA Case Dismissal Plea in 2020 Riots

Today, 15th April, The Delhi High Court asked the Enforcement Directorate to provide evidence supporting Tahir Hussain’s plea to dismiss the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case related to the 2020 riots. The court reviewing the maintainability of the plea and scheduled the hearing for September. Hussain’s lawyer will also be allowed to file a response.

Madhya Pradesh HC: Withholding Food Over Unmet Dowry is Cruelty

Today, 11th April, The Madhya Pradesh High Court (HC) ruled that denying food to a married woman due to unmet dowry demands constitutes physical and mental cruelty, punishable under Section 498A of the IPC. The court also noted that forcing a woman to live in her parental home due to dowry non-payment constitutes mental harassment. The ruling rejected the plea to dismiss a First Information Report (FIR) filed by the wife against her husband and in-laws, stating the allegations of withholding food and mental harassment were substantial. The court emphasized that the FIR was not retaliatory and dismissed the husband’s petition.

Allahabad High Court Criticizes UP Police Officials for Non-Compliance with Court Orders

Allahabad High Court has expressed its dissatisfaction with the level of compliance by senior state officials to court orders. The case in question revolves around Ankit Baliyan, a police constable implicated in a corruption scandal involving the alleged extortion of a scrap dealer. The Allahabad High Court has expressed its dissatisfaction with the level of […]

Supreme Court : Odisha BJP MLA Jayanarayan Mishra Gets Interim Protection in Modesty Case

Jayanarayan Mishra, a BJP member in Odisha, faces serious accusations including disrespecting a woman and assaulting a public servant. The Supreme Court’s temporary protection from arrest has sparked legal discussions. The case raises questions about the safety of law enforcement officials and highlights the judiciary’s role in balancing justice for powerful figures.

Delhi High Court: Marks Not Everything, No FIR in Suicide of 2 Scheduled Caste Students

The Delhi High Court, led by Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, emphasizes the importance of prioritizing students’ mental well-being over academic success in the wake of tragic incidents at IIT Delhi. The ruling underscores the need for a more supportive educational environment, addressing mental health challenges and caste-based discrimination. It sets the stage for a more inclusive approach to education.