Today, On 25th April, The Supreme Court criticised Rahul Gandhi over his remarks on Savarkar, reminding him, “Does he know his grandmother also sent a letter to the freedom fighter praising him?” The Court granted a stay on the defamation case but warned against further irresponsible statements.
Today, On 4th April, The Allahabad High Court rejected Rahul Gandhi’s plea challenging a summoning order in the Savarkar defamation case. A sessions court had issued the summons last December, citing that his remarks on Savarkar promoted hatred and ill-will. The court’s decision means Gandhi must now appear as required in the legal proceedings. This case adds to the ongoing legal challenges faced by the Congress leader.
Today, On 28th March, The Supreme Court ruled that the notion of art or stand-up comedy inciting hatred could severely restrict free speech. The court emphasized that literature, poetry, drama, films, satire, and stage performances enrich human life. It highlighted the importance of artistic expression in a democratic society. The verdict reinforces the constitutional protection of creative freedom in India.
Aaditya Thackeray dismissed allegations against him in the Disha Salian case as an “attempt to malign” his image. On Wednesday, Disha Salian’s father, Satish Salian, approached the Bombay High Court, seeking a fresh investigation into her death. He also requested an FIR and a CBI probe against Aaditya Thackeray. The plea created controversy surrounding the case, drawing political and public attention.
Today, On 18th March, The Kerala High Court reaffirmed that victims linked to the Hema Committee Report are not obligated to pursue the matter. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar stated that individuals receiving summons can inform authorities if they choose not to proceed. However, repeated notices may be sent due to uncertainty in receipt confirmation. The court emphasized that anyone facing harassment or coercion can seek legal relief.
Today, On 4th March, The Bombay High Court stayed the order directing the registration of an FIR against former SEBI chief Madhabi Buch and two others. Justice SG Dige granted the relief after they challenged the directive in court. The case involves allegations that prompted legal scrutiny of regulatory decisions. The stay provides temporary relief as the matter undergoes further judicial review.
Today, On 3rd February, A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar dismissed the appeal against the Karnataka High Court’s decision to quash the FIR filed against Nalin Kateel. After reviewing the complaint, the Bench found it to be “full of assumptions.” The Court emphasized that there was no sufficient basis to continue with the FIR. The ruling marks a significant development in the legal proceedings involving Kateel.
Bengaluru Police registered an FIR against Infosys Co-Founder and IISc Director under the SC/ST Act. The action follows a court order based on a complaint by a former IISc faculty member. The complainant alleged caste-based discrimination at the institute. The case has sparked debate over workplace bias and legal accountability.
Today, On 15th January, The Karnataka High Court heard final arguments on a petition filed by BS Yediyurappa seeking to quash the FIR against him under the POCSO Act. The FIR alleges his involvement in the sexual assault of a minor girl. The state has argued that Yediyurappa must face trial in the matter. The court’s decision on the petition is awaited.