Today(on 8th July),The Supreme Court, led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, dismissed West Bengal’s Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court directive for a CBI investigation into allegations in Sandeshkhali. Despite the State’s request for a deferral, the Court upheld the broader scope of the investigation, encompassing multiple FIRs including those related to the Ration Scam.
The Supreme Court set to decide on the disqualification of Jaganmohan Rao as president of the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) on July 23. Rao’s eligibility is in question due to his club’s lack of recognition and alleged irregularities in his election. Corruption allegations against him remain unaddressed by the current HCA leadership.
Yesterday, 3rd July, The Enforcement Directorate (ED) plans to challenge the Jharkhand High Court’s decision to grant bail to former Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The ED argues that the court’s belief in Soren’s innocence is mistaken and that he does not meet the requirements of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Soren’s legal battles have drawn widespread attention. The appeal’s outcome could significantly impact his political career and legal processes in Jharkhand.
Today, On 1st July, India’s Home Minister, Amit Shah, has unveiled three new criminal laws that prioritize justice over punishment, marking a departure from colonial-era statutes. These laws aim to streamline legal processes, ensure swifter justice delivery, and prioritize rehabilitation over stringent penalties. The reforms highlight a significant shift towards a more responsive and inclusive legal framework in India, addressing contemporary societal needs and evolving criminal challenges.
Today (3rd June): Two BJP candidates, Pranat Tudu and Rekha Patra, along with party workers, approached the Calcutta High Court to address alleged false police complaints hindering their participation in vote counting for the Lok Sabha election. The court scheduled a hearing and also received petitions from BJP workers identifying themselves as party counting agents. The BJP has requested re-elections in 412 polling booths, alleging widespread election malpractices, and criticized the ruling Trinamool Congress for favoring tactics that led to clashes and injuries.
Today (14th May): The Supreme Court rejected BJP leader H Raja’s plea to dismiss criminal cases against him for controversial comments on Periyar and women. The court stressed the decline in political discourse and the need for caution in public statements by politicians. The charges stem from Raja’s derogatory remarks, and the legal proceedings will continue as the court upheld the accountability of political speech.
NEW DELHI: Today (April 29): The Supreme Court postponed the hearing of the State of West Bengal’s Special Leave Petition (SLP), which challenges the High Court’s order for a CBI investigation into alleged sexual assault, violence, and land grabbing in Sandeshkhali. The adjournment was granted at the request of the state’s counsel, with the court instructing that the petition’s pendency should not be exploited to prolong proceedings in the Calcutta High Court.
Today(on 26th April), The Calcutta High Court has directed the NIA to investigate the recent clashes in Murshidabad during Ram Navami, considering transferring the case to the central agency. The court’s decision follows a report detailing the use of explosives and weaponry, and it has set a deadline for the NIA to submit its report by May 10.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL against IAS Officer Aunjaneya Kumar Singh, who had lodged 66 FIRs against Azam Khan and his sons. The court ruled that PILs cannot be entertained in service matters, only by non-appointees challenging the legality or extension of an officer. Singh’s actions were related to the model code of conduct during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.
Today, On 23rd April, The Bombay High Court initiated police action against BJP MLAs Geeta Jain and Nitesh Rane for alleged hate speeches, following concerns raised by Mumbai residents. With growing scrutiny on public figure rhetoric, the Court directed police commissioners to personally review speech videos and transcripts to prevent potential violence and disturbance during upcoming elections and religious rallies.