The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the trials in the Anti-Sikh riots cases were conducted in a manner that led to the acquittal of the accused. The Supreme Court bench noted that the central government must explain why all the acquittals and dismissals were not appealed in higher courts. This raises concerns about the handling of the cases. The government has been asked to provide clarity on the issue.
NEW DELHI: On Tuesday, January 21, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) seeking to cancel the bail granted to Chhagan Bhujbal, former Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister and current NCP MLA, and his nephew Sameer Bhujbal. The case is linked to allegations of money laundering in the Maharashtra Sadan scam.
Today, On 20th January, The Supreme Court stated that individuals like Tahir Hussain should be disqualified from contesting elections. This comment came during a hearing of Hussain’s plea. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that persons with certain backgrounds are prevented from entering the political arena. The statement raises concerns about eligibility and public accountability in politics.
Today, On 20th January, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that halal certification is not limited to meat products but is being applied to many other items like cement and water bottles. He expressed shock at this practice and said that agencies charge hefty fees for these certifications. Mehta also pointed out that the total money collected through such certifications runs into several lakh crores, raising serious concerns.
Today, On 9th January, Actor, director, and producer Manchu Mohan Babu has received relief from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has directed that Mohan Babu should not be arrested until the hearing on his anticipatory bail plea is completed. It is known that an attempt to murder case was filed against Mohan Babu in connection with an attack on a journalist.
The Delhi High Court suggested introducing a ‘Consent Calendar’ to simplify the process of handling compromise-based petitions for quashing FIRs. This step aims to speed up cases where all parties agree, easing the workload of the courts. The court has also issued clear guidelines to ensure these cases are handled quickly and uniformly.
Justice Rohinton Nariman condemned the surge of legal challenges concerning religious sites, asserting they contradict the Places of Worship Act, which preserves the status of worship places as of August 15, 1947. He warned such lawsuits could incite communal discord and urged their dismissal, emphasizing adherence to the rule of law.
![[2020 Clash with TMC Workers] "Ensures Trial May Commence, and Justice Is Done to the Parties": SC Transfers 2 FIRs to CBI Against WB BJP Leader Kabir Shankar Bose](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-1-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 4th December, the Supreme Court transferred two FIRs against West Bengal BJP leader Kabir Shankar Bose to the CBI due to concerns over local investigation impartiality. The FIRs relate to a 2020 clash with TMC workers, highlighting the judiciary’s commitment to ensure a fair and unbiased inquiry.
On December 2, the Supreme Court temporarily released YSRCP social media in-charge Sajjala Bhargava Reddy, allowing him to approach the High Court regarding multiple FIRs alleging derogatory online posts about Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu. The court granted him two weeks of protection from arrest while emphasizing the importance of High Courts.
Today, On 2nd December, the Supreme Court addressed a plea against provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court allowed a two-week stay on the petitioner’s arrest while directing him to seek relief from the High Court, emphasizing the need for proper legal recourse under existing laws.