Today, On 23rd June, The Supreme Court raised a key question on issuing OBC certificates to children of single mothers, asking, “What if there’s inter-caste marriage?” The Court said the issue is important and needs proper discussion with all States involved.
The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by the Indian Parliament, alters the 1995 Waqf Act, prompting widespread debate and legal challenges. Notable changes include expanded government control and inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards, raising concerns about religious autonomy. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing its constitutional validity amidst ongoing hearings.
![[IndiGo Vs Mahindra] Mahindra Restrain Not To Use '6E' Mark Till Disposal Of IndiGo Suit: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-13.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
IndiGo is asserting its “6E” trademark rights against Mahindra Electric, which agreed to rename its upcoming electric vehicle from “BE 6E” to “BE 6” amid the legal dispute. Mahindra plans to contest the lawsuit while the court has scheduled a hearing for April 2025, highlighting the significance of trademark usage over mere registration.
The Supreme Court has extended the interim stay on defamation proceedings against IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil until November 5, related to a personal conflict with IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri. The dispute escalated after controversial photos were shared, leading to legal claims from both parties regarding reputational damage and alleged misconduct.
![[BREAKING] 'Unconstitutional' and 'Unsecular': CJI to Hold Final Hearing on Pleas Challenging Allahabad HC’s Order Scrapping UP Madarsa Education Act on August 13](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-30-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today has set a final hearing on August 13 for petitions challenging the annulment of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004. The Act was declared unconstitutional by the Allahabad High Court, but the Supreme Court highlighted the need for regulatory measures and stayed the high court’s judgment.
On Tuesday(23rd July),The Supreme Court of India has allowed the Rajasthan government-constituted committee to proceed with its investigation into the Ekal Patta case. Justices Surya Kant and Ujjwal Bhuyan issued this order, underscoring the committee’s vital role, as highlighted by Rajasthan’s Additional Advocate General Shiv Mangal Sharma.