Today, On 7th February, The Supreme Court ruled that relatives of an accused cannot be implicated in domestic violence cases under Section 498A simply for not assisting the victim. The Court emphasized that complaints and charges must be specific against each accused family member. It stated that vague or general allegations are not sufficient for prosecution. This decision aims to prevent misuse of the law and ensure fairness in such cases.
The Supreme Court of India ruled against a woman’s misuse of legal protections intended for domestic violence victims, quashing her FIR under Section 498A, which lacked specific evidence. The judgment highlighted the need for courts to scrutinize such cases, aiming to protect innocent family members and prevent retaliatory legal actions during divorce proceedings.
Kuldeep Singh Sengar, an expelled BJP leader, requested the Delhi High Court to extend his interim bail by five months on medical grounds related to his ailments. The court scheduled a hearing for December 20 and noted concerns about excessive visitors disrupting his medical care at AIIMS. Sengar’s appeal against his conviction remains pending.
![[2002 Godhra Train Burning Incident] High Court Refuses Bail To Convict To Attend To Ailing Father](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Godhra-Train-Burning-Case-karsevak.webp?resize=440%2C247&ssl=1)
Faruk Mohammad Bhana, convicted for his role in the 2002 Godhra train burning that killed 59, had his request for temporary bail denied by the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that other family members could care for Bhana’s unwell father and highlighted his recent 8-day bail as a factor in the decision.