Persistent Refusal Of Conjugal Rights Constitutes Mental Cruelty And Grounds For Divorce: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that persistent refusal of sexual relations without reasonable cause constitutes mental cruelty and can be a valid ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. Upholding a Rajasthan High Court judgment, the Court dismissed a wife’s appeal challenging the dissolution of marriage.

Thali/Mangalsutra Is a Sacred Symbol of Married Life; Its Removal by Wife Amounts to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court observed that voluntary removal of the thali may, depending on the facts of a case, cause emotional anguish and amount to mental cruelty. However, the Court clarified that removal of the thali is not automatically a ground for divorce and must be assessed in context.

Mother’s Alleged Remarriage Cannot Defeat Minor Children’s Right to Maintenance from Biological Father: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court held that a mother’s alleged remarriage cannot defeat the independent statutory right of minor children to claim maintenance from their biological father, reaffirming that a father’s obligation to maintain his children continues regardless of matrimonial disputes or changes in the mother’s marital status.

DLSAs And Lok Adalats Cannot Exercise Judicial Powers To Grant Divorce: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court held that Lok Adalats and District Legal Services Authorities cannot grant divorce decrees, ruling that only family courts possess jurisdiction to dissolve marriages, while Lok Adalats are limited to facilitating settlements and lack authority to exercise judicial powers in matrimonial disputes.

Wife Secretly Arranging Daughter’s Marriage Without Informing Husband Is Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court ruled that a wife’s act of secretly arranging their daughter’s marriage without informing the father amounts to mental cruelty under matrimonial law, and granted divorce after finding her conduct caused distress preventing continuation thereafter.

“Appellant Cannot Put Respondent At Disadvantage and Claim Benefit”: Delhi High Court Dismisses Husband’s Matrimonial Appeal Over Delay

The Delhi High Court dismissed a husband’s matrimonial appeal, ruling he could not penalize his wife for delayed defence filing after failing to deposit litigation expenses on time, observing that a party cannot create disadvantage for the respondent and later claim benefit from it.

Such Law Doesn’t Exist In Any Statute: Allahabad High Court Slams Family Court Over Divorce Grant To Muslim Woman

The Allahabad High Court quashed a family court’s divorce order after noting it was passed under a non-existent law, observing that the judge repeatedly cited the “Muslim Women Marriage Dissolution Act, 1986” instead of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939.

Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Order for Fresh Trial After Divorce Granted Under a Non-Existent Law Provision

Supreme Court of India stayed the Delhi High Court order directing a retrial in a matrimonial dispute. The case involved a family court granting divorce under a non-existent statutory provision, prompting the Supreme Court to intervene halt proceedings.

Father-In-Law Must Maintain Widowed Daughter-In-Law And Her Child: Chhattisgarh High Court

The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld a Family Court ruling directing a father-in-law to provide maintenance to his widowed daughter-in-law and her minor daughter. The bench affirmed that the statutory obligation applied despite his appeal before the judges today.

Courts Are Often Intimidating, Can Scar A Child Emotionally: Madhya Pradesh HC While Revising Visitation Terms

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that children should not be required to attend courtrooms merely for visitation purposes, stressing that such environments can be intimidating and emotionally distressing for minors. The Court remarked, “The Courts should be the last resort for a child to visit because courts are often seen as intimidating, sterile, and stressful environments that can scar a child emotionally.”