The Delhi High Court permitted the BJP-led government to withdraw its petition opposing the Lieutenant Governor’s decision to let the Delhi Police appoint Special Public Prosecutors for the 2020 northeast Delhi riots and 2021 Republic Day violence. The case, initiated by the previous AAP government, raised concerns over fair trial implications.
The Supreme Court of India affirmed that individuals accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act have the right to access documents not used by the Enforcement Directorate in their prosecution, ensuring a fair trial as per Article 21 of the Constitution. This includes rights to request evidence, promoting transparency in legal proceedings.
The ED filed this plea back in 2022, stating that a fair trial in Kerala would not be possible due to strong connections between the accused and senior officials in the Kerala government. New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has asked four accused individuals to respond to a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate […]
Today, On 12th February, The Calcutta High Court has said that the RG Kar Hospital financial irregularities case should be handled quickly to keep people’s trust in the courts. This case was filed soon after the rape and murder of a junior doctor at the hospital, which shocked the entire country. The court warned that delayed justice could make people lose faith in the legal system. It has asked the authorities to conduct a fair and fast investigation into the matter.
Today, On 11th February, The Calcutta High Court emphasized that corruption in influential positions significantly undermines public confidence while hearing the RG Kar case. The court stressed the need for transparency and accountability in governance to maintain trust in public institutions. Allegations of corruption in the case have raised concerns over ethical misconduct in administrative affairs. The court’s remarks highlight the broader impact of corruption on society and the justice system.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on wednesday, set aside the conviction of three men who were declared guilty by the Punjab & Haryana High Court almost 20 years after they were acquitted by the trial court in a murder case. A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan expressed deep concerns about the standards of Public Prosecutors in High Courts. The Court criticized the way in which the Punjab & Haryana High Court overturned the acquittal based on the Public Prosecutor’s arguments.
Today, On 27th January, The Supreme Court rejected the request to transfer the corruption case against YS Jagan Mohan Reddy from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The Court noted that the High Court is already overseeing the case and has directed daily hearings at the trial court, making a transfer unnecessary. The decision emphasizes the ongoing monitoring of the case at the local level. The ruling indicates confidence in the existing judicial process.
The Bombay High Court mandated the Narcotics Control Bureau to provide investigation documents to Vedish Thorat, arrested for drug offenses, including cultivating hydroponic weed. Thorat’s lawyer argued that the denial of crucial documents hindered his defense and violated fair trial rights. The case highlights procedural issues in narcotics investigations.
A Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih suggested that a courtroom could be established within the jail to address the issue. NEW DELHI: On Thursday(21st Nov), the Supreme Court proposed the possibility of setting up a temporary courtroom in jail for the physical cross-examination of terror convict Yasin Malik, who is […]
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court condemned “bulldozer justice,” stating that legal actions should not imply guilt before a fair trial. It ruled demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful, emphasizing due process, accountability, and the protection of family homes from arbitrary state action, regardless of accusations or convictions.
