The Supreme Court of India intervened to aid homebuyers affected by Unitech Ltd.’s financial troubles and project delays. The court granted an exemption from RERA registration for Unitech’s housing projects, facilitating stalled loan disbursements and appointing government oversight to address ongoing issues, ensuring faster project completion and accountability for past mismanagement.
The Supreme Court reserved its judgment on the customs department’s review plea regarding a 2021 ruling that denied DRI officers the authority to recover duties on cleared goods. The case involved arguments on whether DRI officials qualify as customs officers, with the opposing side asserting that the original judgment contained errors.
![[POCSO Case] Karnataka HC Grants Yediyurappa Dispense of Personal Appearance Before Trial Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Karnataka High Court today postponed the hearing to dismiss the POCSO case against former Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa until July 26. Yediyurappa has been granted dispensation from appearing in court on July 15 for an alleged sexual harassment case involving a minor. The CID has filed a chargesheet, and the case dates back to February.
The Supreme Court issued a notice in response to a plea from the High Court Advocates Bar Association, Jabalpur, and the M.P. High Court Bar Association. The petition challenges a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that dismissed their writ petition against the disconnection of their electricity supply and seeks a stay on the recovery of the bill.
Today, 19th April, Due to rising temperatures, Calcutta High Court has exempted lawyers from wearing black gowns until the summer ends. The exemption aims to provide comfort during the heatwave, reflecting a practical approach to courtroom attire. This decision aligns with similar directives from other High Courts, acknowledging the ongoing heat conditions and impending summer break.
The Supreme Court ruled that enemy properties vested with government-appointed custodians are not assets of the central government. The court emphasized that the custodian is a trustee and does not acquire ownership of the assets. Hence, the central government cannot claim exemption from civic taxes. The ruling favored the Lucknow Municipal Corporation in their appeal.