![[Excise Scam] Delhi Court Sets Nov 28 for Hearing Kejriwal's Plea Over Sanction Copy in ED Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-23.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Arvind Kejriwal challenged the Enforcement Directorate’s charges in the Excise Policy case at the Delhi High Court, seeking access to prosecution documents. A judge mandated the ED to respond by November 26. The case stems from alleged corruption in the excise policy, leading to Kejriwal’s arrest in March 2024.
![[Breaking] Excise Policy Case: Will File Response to K Kavitha's Bail Plea by Aug 22, ED Tells Supreme court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-69-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th July, A Delhi court extended Arvind Kejriwal and K Kavitha’s custody until September 2 in the excise ‘scam’ case. Despite an earlier Supreme Court decision for interim bail, Kejriwal remains in Tihar Jail due to unfulfilled bail bond requirements. The case, involving alleged corruption and conspiracy by AAP leaders, continues to draw attention and legal scrutiny.
![[BREAKING] "Suffered for 90 Days": SC Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal | Refers Legal Question on PMLA to Larger Bench](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-2-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th June, The Enforcement Directorate (ED) criticized the trial court’s hasty granting of bail to Arvind Kejriwal, emphasizing that it undermined the judicial process’s integrity. The Supreme Court allowed Kejriwal to file a substantial appeal, as the ED highlighted procedural lapses and failure to comply with mandatory conditions. Additionally, the CBI was granted permission to formally arrest Kejriwal.
![[Excise Case] Delhi Court Grants Interim Bail to Businessman Amit Arora](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-13.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi Court granted interim bail to businessman Amit Arora in connection with an excise duty case, considering his wife’s health and family responsibilities. The judge instructed him not to leave Delhi NCR, tamper with evidence, or engage in criminal activities. Arora’s legal team emphasized his prior compliance with legal requirements and absence of misuse of bail.