Today, On 5th May, the Delhi HC scheduled a hearing for AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia’s pleas against the ED chargesheet in the excise policy case on August 12, challenging the court’s order in the investigation.
Delhi Lieutenant Governor (LG) VK Saxena has given approval to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to prosecute AAP leader and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the excise policy case. The sanction was granted after the ED formally requested it on December 5, 2024. The case centers on allegations of irregularities and illegal payments related to the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.
Today, On 23rd, August, The CBI obtained sanction to prosecute Arvind Kejriwal and AAP MLA Durgesh Pathak in an alleged corruption case. The case’s progression is expected to impact the Aam Aadmi Party’s perception and its leadership’s political fortunes. The upcoming August 27 hearing will shape the narrative around this high-stakes case, with further legal battles predicted.
Today, On 21st August, AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sandeep Pathak appealed to the Delhi High Court after being denied permission to meet CM Arvind Kejriwal in jail. Pathak argued that the decision was arbitrary and lacked a valid basis, emphasizing the importance of access to political leaders in custody. The court scheduled further proceedings after hearing arguments from both sides.
Today, On 20th July, Arvind Kejriwal’s custody extended until August 27 in a corruption case related to an alleged excise scam. Delhi High Court upholds arrest as “legal,” stating evidence and witness influence concerns. Supreme Court issues notice to CBI in bail petition, denying interim bail request on health grounds. Kejriwal’s arrest by CBI labeled as “insurance arrest.”
The Delhi Court ,Today, 24th April mandated the CBI to disclose accused statements and evidence in the Excise Scam Case, emphasizing transparency and fair trial. Further hearings and bail plea decisions are expected, with the accused provided an opportunity to prepare a defense. This development portrays the delicate balance between prosecutorial power and the rights of the accused.
