The Supreme Court of India has issued a notice to the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying on a plea seeking a ban on killing animals during religious practices. The petitioner argues such acts violate animal welfare.
Today, On 1st April, The Supreme Court raised concerns over the absence of an Advocate-on-Record (AoR) in a case involving unethical legal practices, questioning the integrity of the profession. The court noted that some advocates, instead of upholding justice, resort to unfair means. When caught, they often evade accountability by offering an unconditional apology, claiming their actions were unintentional. This observation highlights the growing need for stricter enforcement of ethical standards in the legal system.
The Supreme Court today directed the Indian Medical Association (IMA) to ensure the removal of misleading advertisements by Patanjali Ayurved. It particularly targets 14 products whose licenses were revoked. The court appointed an amicus curiae and instructed the licensing authority to submit an affidavit regarding the licensing process. IMA president issued an unconditional apology.
![[BREAKING] Patanjali Case | "Your Public Apology Published Was Illegible, Font Miniscule": SC Slams IMA President Over His 'Damaging' Statements](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shared-image.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Indian Medical Association’s Chief, Dr. R V Asokan, publicly apologized for remarks made about the Supreme Court, clarifying that he meant no disrespect. This followed the Court’s comments during a case involving misleading advertisements. The IMA has filed a petition against such ads and emphasizes the priority of promoting ethical practices within the association.