The NLU Consortium has appealed to the Delhi High Court against a ruling that required revising CLAT 2025 results due to errors identified in the exam questions. The court acknowledged mistakes in two questions and mandated corrections, while the Consortium argues this judicial intervention oversteps boundaries on academic matters. Both sides await further hearings.
An appeal has been filed before the Delhi High Court challenging a single-judge’s recent verdict on a plea raising concerns about errors in the questions and final answer key released for the Common Law Admission Test, 2025 (CLAT) for undergraduate law admissions. A single judge had earlier found errors in two questions and directed a revision of CLAT results. The law aspirant who filed the plea, however, says that the single judge failed to notice other ‘blatant mistakes.’
The Supreme Court reprimanded its Registry for failing to list a Special Leave Petition as directed, stressing the need for compliance with court orders. The Court warned of serious consequences for repeated errors or negligence in handling case files and instructed the Registry to provide a report explaining its determination that the petition was filed on time.