Today, On 6th March, The Supreme Court scheduled hearings for pleas challenging the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment Today. This ruling upheld key provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), granting extensive powers to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Several petitioners argue that the verdict violates constitutional rights and needs reconsideration.
NEW DELHI: Today, 28th Feb, The Supreme Court of India granted pre-arrest bail to Satish Chandra Verma, former Advocate General of Chhattisgarh, in connection with the Nagrik Apurti Nigam (NAN) scam case. The decision was made on Friday by a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, who also directed Verma to fully cooperate in the investigation.
Today, On 20th February, A Delhi court rejected the defamation case filed by AAP leader Satyendar Jain against BJP leader Bansuri Swaraj. Jain had accused Swaraj of making defamatory remarks against him. The court ruled that the statements did not warrant legal action. This decision marks a legal victory for Swaraj in the ongoing political tussle.
Today, On 13th February, The Delhi High Court issued a notice on Mandoli Jail’s plea challenging permission for Sukesh Chandrashekhar to wear a wristwatch. The jail authorities argue against allowing him to keep the watch inside the facility. This legal move adds to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the high-profile inmate. The court’s decision could set a precedent for prison regulations on personal belongings.
The Supreme Court questioned Senthilbalaji on whether he intends to continue as a minister while facing trial as an accused in a money laundering case linked to a cash-for-jobs scam. The court’s inquiry highlights concerns over holding public office while being under investigation, raising significant legal and ethical questions about his role in the government.
Today, On 6th February, A Delhi court raised concerns over the maintainability of a defamation complaint filed by AAP leader Satyendra Jain against Karnail Singh. The court questioned how the case could be heard before the Special MP-MLA Court. Jain had alleged defamatory statements were made against him, prompting legal action. The matter is now under judicial consideration for jurisdictional clarity.
A Delhi court exempted Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Durgesh Pathak from personally attending a hearing in the excise policy case due to their election campaigning. The case, now postponed to February 3, 2025, involves corruption allegations in the implementation of the excise policy. The CBI and ED are investigating these charges for possible money laundering.
The Supreme Court postponed the hearing on EVM verification to February 11, following concerns about the Election Commission’s compliance with its earlier directive. The case relates to an application by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) seeking verification of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). The adjournment allows further time to address the compliance issues raised. The matter remains critical for ensuring transparency in the electoral process.
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court, on Tuesday, criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for initiating a money laundering investigation against a real estate developer without proper grounds. The court imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh each on the ED and the complainant, asserting that central agencies cannot misuse their authority to harass citizens.