The Allahabad High Court, led by Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, held that the correctness of allegations cannot be tested under Section 482 CrPC, dismissing Sahara’s plea to quash the Enforcement Directorate’s money laundering investigation.
Today, On 22nd September, The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the Delhi High Court’s decision dismissing Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to quash the ECIR. The case involves alleged money laundering of Rs.200 crore linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Delhi High Court ruling that dismissed actor Jacqueline Fernandez’s […]
The Supreme Court emphasized the need for a clear legal framework to prevent courts from recalling orders without hearing the parties involved. It stated that such actions must adhere to the principles of natural justice. Courts are also obligated to provide valid reasons when deciding to withdraw an order. The ruling aims to enhance transparency and accountability in judicial processes.
Today, On 3rd December, the Delhi High Court scheduled a hearing for January 2025 regarding Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar’s plea against the Enforcement Directorate’s money laundering investigation. Shivakumar argues the probe lacks merit and is politically motivated. The case could significantly impact ongoing legal proceedings against him.
![[Reconsideration of 2022 PMLA Verdict] "Came Up Suddenly, Need Time to Prepare": SC Postpones Hearing to Aug 28](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-24-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 7th August, The Supreme Court postponed the hearing to August 28 for petitions seeking a reconsideration of the 2022 Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) verdict, acknowledging the complexity and importance of the matters being reviewed. This delay aims to provide all parties adequate time to prepare and addresses critical questions about the scope and limits of the ED’s powers.