The Karnataka High Court ruled that election manifesto pledges, like the ‘five guarantees’, do not constitute corrupt practices. The dismissal of a petition against Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad sets a precedent, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence implicating candidates for commitments outlined in manifestos to be deemed as corrupt practices. The decision safeguards the democratic process and clarifies the legal standing of election promises.
The manifestos of the Congress and CPI(M) parties aim to make changes to India’s legal landscape. Both parties have proposed repealing controversial laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Additionally, they advocate for bifurcating the Supreme Court, likely to address issues related to the workload and efficiency of the judiciary.
