The ECI submitted an affidavit on 22nd May, to the Supreme Court, arguing against the disclosure of Form 17C data, stating it could confuse voters. The ECI criticized ADR for making false allegations and seeking unfounded entitlements. A potential legal battle looms as the Supreme Court asks ECI to respond to ADR’s application, raising transparency concerns.
Taking selfies or videos in polling booths is illegal, ensuring voter privacy and preventing election interference. Technology in elections can improve accessibility but introduces cybersecurity risks. India’s laws safeguard voting privacy, prohibiting disclosure of voting choice and use of electronic devices in polling stations. Violations may result in legal consequences and disqualification as a voter.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail to the civic official involved in the creation of bogus votes. Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao highlighted that the creation of such a large number of fake votes contradicted the essence of democracy. Andhra Pradesh: This Month (1st May): The Andhra Pradesh High Court refused to grant […]
![[EVM-VVPAT Case] Review Petition Filed Against SC Judgement Passed on April 26th](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (13th May): A review petition has been filed challenging the Supreme Court’s decision to reject the plea for EVM-VVPAT tallying. The petitioner argues that the judgment contains apparent errors and mistakes, emphasizing the need for enhanced security measures. The plea advocates for greater transparency in the voting process, emphasizing the vulnerability of electronic voting machines and the necessity of VVPAT verification.
Today, On 10th May, The Andhra Pradesh High Court temporarily stopped cash transfers by the ruling YSR Congress Party to government initiative recipients until after the May 13 elections. This decision follows concerns over potential influence on voters. Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy accused political opponents of seeking to obstruct welfare initiatives. The pause is aimed at ensuring a fair electoral process.
![[PM Modi Hate Speech Case] TN Congress Moves Madras HC Over ECI Inaction](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (8th May): The Tamil Nadu Congress Committee filed a petition in the Madras High Court, alleging that the Election Commission of India failed to address hate speeches by Prime Minister Modi. They claim Modi made inflammatory, disrespectful, and divisive remarks targeting specific communities, inciting communal tensions and aiming to manipulate votes in favor of the BJP.
Today, 1st May, The Election Commission responded to the Supreme Court’s directive on Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) units, detailing compliance plans. It updated procedures for managing Symbol Loading Units (SLUs) as per the mandate, requiring them to be sealed and stored alongside EVMs for 45 days post-election results. The response emphasizes the commitment to electoral integrity and technology standards.
Today, 30th April, The Gujarat High Court declined an urgent hearing for a Public Interest Litigation challenging the uncontested election of a BJP candidate in Surat. Chief Justice Agarwal emphasized adherence to established legal procedures for election grievances, rejecting the use of PILs for election disputes. This case raises important questions about fair electoral processes and democratic perception.
![[Lok Sabha Election 2024] Direct Police Protection for Transgender Candidate: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-21-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
On Monday (29th April): The Delhi High Court directed police protection for a transgender candidate filing a nomination for the 2024 Lok Sabha Election, emphasizing equal protection under Article 14 of the Constitution. This came after the candidate faced a life-threatening attack. The court instructed the police to ensure security and facilitate the nomination process in South Delhi.
Today(on 24th April), the Supreme Court is expected to issue directions on petitions seeking 100% cross-verification of votes in EVMs with VVPAT slips for transparency. The VVPAT serves as an independent mechanism for voters to verify vote accuracy. The bench engaged in detailed discussions on EVM operations and expressed reservations about manual counting.
