The Supreme Court ruled that political parties’ manifesto promises, potentially leading to financial aid for the public, do not constitute ‘corrupt practices’ under the law. The Court emphasized the need for scrutiny and accountability in implementing such promises. A voter’s appeal challenging the Congress party’s promises was rejected, leaving the legal question open for future consideration.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that election manifesto pledges, like the ‘five guarantees’, do not constitute corrupt practices. The dismissal of a petition against Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad sets a precedent, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence implicating candidates for commitments outlined in manifestos to be deemed as corrupt practices. The decision safeguards the democratic process and clarifies the legal standing of election promises.
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah denied bribery allegations related to the 2023 election manifesto in a court hearing. The petitioner claimed the Congress party’s promises were bribery, but Siddaramaiah’s representative argued lack of evidence and errors in the petition. The court adjourned the hearing until April 18, indicating the case’s significance.
