The Supreme Court of India criticized the four-day delay in filing a First Information Report (FIR) related to a student suicide at IIT Kharagpur. The Court demanded appearances from IIT officials and police to explain the delay. It reflects growing concerns about student suicides and accountability among educational institutions and authorities.
Today, On 8th April, During a hearing on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting the rise in crimes against women, particularly rape cases, the Supreme Court made a strong appeal to the government. The bench stated, “Leave the women alone in this country; let them grow,” urging authorities to broaden sensitisation efforts. The Court stressed the urgent need for awareness and prevention measures. It emphasized that protecting women’s rights and dignity must be a national priority.
Today, 28th March, The Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea concerning the reservation of seats for children of Armed Forces personnel in educational institutions. The petition seeks clarity on admission policies and benefits provided to such students. The case highlights the need for recognizing the sacrifices of military families. The court’s decision could impact future educational opportunities for children of defense personnel.
The Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KELSA) has filed a PIL in the Kerala High Court, urging a stronger mechanism to tackle the growing issue of ragging in educational institutions. Citing a concerning rise in such incidents, KELSA emphasized the need for stricter measures. The petition seeks enhanced enforcement of anti-ragging laws to ensure student safety. The court’s intervention is expected to improve preventive and punitive actions against ragging.
A committee led by two former High Court judges has submitted its report on the Badlapur school sexual abuse case, proposing key safety measures. The recommendations include mandatory CCTV installation and thorough character verification of school staff. These measures aim to enhance student safety and prevent future incidents in educational institutions. The court will review the suggestions for statewide implementation.
The Supreme Court of India will hear West Bengal’s petition against the Calcutta High Court’s ruling, which invalidated the OBC classification of 77 communities, on January 28 and 29, 2025. The High Court deemed the classification unconstitutional, emphasizing that reservations can’t be based solely on religion. The outcome will influence reservations in jobs and education.
The Delhi High Court supported reducing the mandatory 70% attendance requirement for law courses, urging the Bar Council of India to reconsider this baseline. The judges highlighted the need for a flexible approach, acknowledging students’ commitments, and raising concerns about attendance tracking methods. Improvements in students’ mental health and grievance mechanisms were also emphasized.
The Supreme Court is deliberating a discrimination case involving a transwoman teacher dismissed from two schools in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh after her gender identity became known. The court reserved its judgment, emphasizing that employment termination based on identity is unacceptable, thus highlighting ongoing issues of equality and inclusivity in workplaces.
The Bombay High Court today (23rd Oct) questioned the Maharashtra Government about police accountability regarding the sexual assault of two minor girls in Badlapur. A guilty officer was identified, with further actions pending. The court also emphasized establishing a committee for children’s safety in schools and scheduled a follow-up hearing in six weeks.
Today, On 4th October, the Supreme Court dismissed review petitions challenging its previous ruling that allows sub-classification within Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories for job and education reservations. The court reaffirmed the decision as constitutionally valid, emphasizing the need for equitable distribution of benefits to the most marginalized groups within these communities.
