Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court mandated strict guidelines against arbitrary demolitions linked to accused individuals, emphasizing accountability. Demolitions require prior notice, a 15-day appeal period, and must be documented. Officials failing to comply may face contempt charges and must restore demolished properties at their expense. These directives apply nationwide.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Wrongful Demolitions Warrant Compensation; Officials Should Not Be Shielded from Accountability": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Watch-What-is-Bulldozer-Justice-And-Why-Does-the-SC-Want-Guidelines-Against-It_-on-News9-Plus.png?resize=447%2C348&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court condemned “bulldozer justice,” stating that legal actions should not imply guilt before a fair trial. It ruled demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful, emphasizing due process, accountability, and the protection of family homes from arbitrary state action, regardless of accusations or convictions.
![[Inhumane Prison Conditions] ‘Last Person Matters Most’: SC On Freeing Eligible Female Undertrial Prisoners](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 26th October, the Supreme Court ruled that murder charges do not automatically justify bail denial, emphasizing individual rights and the presumption of innocence. While granting bail to an accused, the Court criticized rigid bail practices and highlighted the need for nuanced case-specific evaluations in pre-trial detention, reinforcing fairness in the justice system.
![[AIBE Controversy] Can Final Year Students Appear for the Exam?|| SC to Hear Plea Against BCI Notification](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Padho-Bhai-Says-CJI-Rejecting-PIL-For-Lowering-of-Cutoff-in-AIBE-Exam.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Final-year law students filed a petition in the Supreme Court contesting a rule preventing them from taking the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). They argue that this restriction violates their rights and delays their entry into the legal profession. The petition seeks to invalidate the rule and requests permission for the students to sit for the exam. The case is set for a hearing on September 13, 2024.
Today, On 10th June, Senthil Balaji, a former Tamil Nadu minister, is under judicial remand until June 14, 2024, related to a money laundering investigation. He petitioned the court to obtain banking documents and faced rejections for bail. The case underscores ongoing legal proceedings and efforts to ensure due process. The complexity is evident in extended remands and reserved orders.
Today (21st May): TISS seeks dismissal of Dalit PhD student Ramadas K S’s plea against suspension due to alleged misconduct and anti-national activities. Mumbai’s Tata Institute of Social Sciences argued that Ramadas bypassed the internal appeal process and urged the Bombay High Court to revoke the suspension order. The court scheduled the next hearing on June 18.
![[Amit Shah's Doctored Video Case] High Court Denies Lunch Motion Moved By Delhi Police](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-25-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Telangana High Court rejected the Delhi police’s lunch motion on 9th May, in the Amit Shah morphed video case, allowing further investigation. The court instructed the police to follow due process and approach the lower court for necessary actions. The case involves allegations of doctoring a video clip of Amit Shah, leading to arrests and ongoing investigations by the Delhi and Hyderabad police.
Today (18th March): The CBI is opposing AAP leader Manish Sisodia’s bail plea. The investigation into the Delhi excise policy implicates Sisodia as the mastermind behind an alleged conspiracy. The Supreme Court has also rejected his bail plea, citing a potential money trail of Rs 338 crore in corruption and money laundering cases.