BREAKING | Parliament Passes Waqf (Amendment) Bill as Rajya Sabha Grants Approval After Heated 2-Day Debate: 128–95 Votes

Parliament Today (April 4) early morning passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, aiming to reform Waqf property management and uplift poor Muslims, especially women. The bill sparked intense debate but was cleared with majority support in both Houses.

BREAKING | Union Minister Kiren Rijiju Introduces Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 in Rajya Sabha

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju Today (April 3) tabled the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Rajya Sabha, following its passage in the Lok Sabha after a 12-hour debate. The bill proposes reforms to enhance the administration of Waqf properties, aiming to address existing complexities and promote transparency.

BREAKING | Midnight Drama in Parliament: Lok Sabha Passes Waqf Amendment Bill After 12-Hour Showdown – 288 vs 232 Votes

Lok Sabha Today (April 3) passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 after a heated 12-hour debate. The Bill brings major changes to how Muslim religious properties are managed, sparking strong reactions across parties.

Waqf Law Shake-Up | “Draconian Section 40 to Be History, Land Can’t Be Turned Waqf Property Overnight”: Kiren Rijiju

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 scraps Draconian Section 40, ending the Waqf Board’s unchecked power to declare any land as Waqf property. Now, only District Collectors can decide, and High Court appeals are allowed.

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act ‘Draconian’ and ‘Unconstitutional’: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, while hearing a plea against the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act, described it as “draconian.” Justices Gavai and Viswanathan admitted the appeal and pointed out the need for further consideration. Concerns were raised about civil liberties and misuse of the Act, which targets organized crime in Uttar Pradesh.

Kapil Sibal will Request To Review of New Criminal Laws if SCBA Agrees

Kapil Sibal, a Rajya Sabha member and senior advocate, expressed strong concerns over new criminal laws, aiming to urge a review if supported by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). He emphasized the lack of consultation in formulating these laws and criticized the decline of the bar’s independence and political polarization. Sibal also critiqued the judiciary’s lack of uniformity in institutional procedures and emphasized the need for introspection in the appointment mechanisms.