The Calcutta High Court granted a divorce to a husband, saying that the “imposition” of his wife’s friend’s family on him was a valid reason for separation. The husband argued that his wife’s constant insistence on visits and the interference of her friends and their families made the situation unbearable. The court agreed with the husband, recognizing that this affected his mental peace.
Today, On 16th December, the Supreme Court requested the Centre to respond to a plea for nationwide guidelines to ensure women’s safety amid rising violence. Representing the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association, advocate Mahalakshmi Pawani emphasized unreported sexual abuse cases, urging strict measures. The court seeks to address systemic issues and improve public safety standards.
Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old techie, died by suicide in his Bengaluru apartment, leaving a 24-page note accusing his wife and her family of harassment and alleging judicial corruption. His family revealed ongoing emotional distress from multiple legal cases filed against him. Bengaluru Police are investigating, summons issued for questioning.
Today, 11th December, the Supreme Court overturned a Telangana High Court ruling regarding a dowry harassment case against Atul Subhash and his family. It emphasized the misuse of legal provisions to target innocent individuals amidst marital disputes. The ruling followed Atul’s tragic suicide, highlighting the need for careful judicial handling of such sensitive accusations.
The Supreme Court upheld life sentences for a husband and mother-in-law in the murder of a woman who sustained 100% burns. The court rejected claims of suicide, emphasizing implausibility and circumstantial evidence pointing to the appellants’ culpability. Their failure to assist and the presence of kerosene cans were also highlighted.
The Madras High Court ruled that Muslim women can claim damages from bigamous husbands, recognizing such actions as domestic violence. It clarified that if a woman disputes triple talaq, the man must seek judicial validation. The court emphasized only state-established courts can adjudicate on divorce matters, rejecting Shariat councils’ authority.
Today, On 23rd October, the Delhi High Court rejected a man’s petition for a gender test on his wife, alleged to be transgender, to dispute her domestic violence case. The court emphasized legal recognition of gender identity and stated that the request posed wider implications in matrimonial matters, directing him to pursue relief in the appropriate forum.
![[Marital Rape] "Will Bring Home Justice For Women In This Case": Snr Adv Karuna Nundy | SC Relisted Matter After 4 Weeks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IMG.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India Today (Oct 23), postponed the hearing of multiple petitions that seek the criminalization of marital rape in the country. The hearing, overseen by a Bench composed of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, was deferred after the counsel from both sides laid out the time required for presenting their arguments. According to the submissions made by the lawyers, each side will need at least one full day to make their case. This led the Court to conclude that a judgment cannot be delivered before CJI Chandrachud’s retirement, which is scheduled for November 10, 2024.
A man petitioned the Delhi High Court today (22nd Oct) for a medical examination of his wife, claiming she concealed her transgender identity, leading to emotional distress and legal complications. He argues that the rights of both spouses in marriage are interdependent, and seeks to avoid maintenance and domestic violence allegations based on her gender status.
Today, On 22nd October, the Supreme Court began hearings on marital rape, examining whether husbands should be exempt from prosecution. Petitioners argue for legal equality for women, challenging existing provisions in Indian law. Advocates highlight that criminalizing marital rape does not threaten marriage, while the government warns of potential negative impacts on marital relationships.