Big Relief for Godrej Consumer Products: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Injunction Order

The Calcutta High Court set aside an ad-interim injunction restraining Godrej Consumer Products from marketing its “Spic” toilet cleaner, with a Division Bench holding that the single judge erred in granting interim relief.

Baby Forest Trademark Dispute: Delhi HC Dismisses Forest Essentials’ Appeal

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by Mountain Valley Springs India in a trademark dispute with Baby Forest Ayurveda. Justices Navin Chawla and Madhu Jain upheld denial of interim relief, allowing Baby Forest to continue operations.

Married Daughter Also Entitled to Ex-Gratia After Father’s Death: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a married daughter cannot be denied ex-gratia and leave encashment benefits arising from her father’s service. Justices Vivek Rusia and Pradeep Mittal ruled that marital status cannot disqualify legal heirs.

BREAKING| Perverse And Illegal: Bombay HC Sets Aside Interim Order, Allows Banks To Resume Action Against Anil Ambani

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court set aside a single judge’s interim order restraining banks and BDO India LLP from acting against Anil Ambani under RBI’s 2024 fraud classification Master Directions, terming the earlier decision perverse and declining stay relief.

Civil Judge Exam 2022 : Supreme Court Allows MP High Court to Proceed with Interviews & Results

The Supreme Court has allowed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to conduct interviews and declare results for the 2022 Civil Judge (Junior Division) Exam after learning that 77 candidates cleared the main examination.

[NTPC Recruitment] Supreme Court Upholds HC’s Ruling on Probation Period Counting as Work Experience

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court’s decision that a probation period should be considered as work experience for NTPC recruitment. The candidate, not an apprentice, received a regular salary and performed duties akin to permanent employees. The advertisement did not specify exclusion of probationary periods, justifying the Division Bench’s interpretation.