Today, On 2nd December, in the Jio-Facebook Case, Supreme Court declines to interfere with SEBI’s Rs.30 lakh penalty on Reliance, holding that the findings raised no substantial question of law. The decision leaves intact SEBI’s action over delayed disclosure of the deal leak.
Today(18th Sept), The Calcutta High Court, led by Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam, has removed RG Kar petitions from its list, noting that many issues are currently pending before the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice suggested deferring the matters until the Supreme Court delivers its rulings.
Today (3rd May): The Supreme Court is considering the possibility of granting interim bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal during the Lok Sabha Elections in light of his arrest by the ED. The court raised concerns regarding the timing of the arrest and potential liability under the PMLA. Kejriwal’s counsel questioned the rationale behind his arrest, emphasizing that his scheduled appearance had been known.
The Delhi High Court issued notice to the Delhi government in response to a petition seeking a ban on disclosing the names and details of individuals accused in rape cases without court authorization. The petition, filed by a doctor accused in a 2023 rape case, emphasizes the need for anonymity until the conclusion of the trial and demands strict prohibitions on media disclosure.
Today (18th March): During the hearing, advocate Mathews Nedumpara claimed that the citizens were unaware of the entire judgment in the Electoral Bond case. NEW DELHI: Today (March 18th): During the hearing concerning the Electoral Bond case, a heated verbal exchange between Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and advocate Mathews Nedumpara, creating waves on social media. […]
The Supreme Court of India overturned a prison term for a doctor found with unlicensed drugs, instead imposing a Rs 1 lakh fine. The ruling emphasizes that possessing a small quantity of medicines without disclosing the source does not endanger public interest, particularly when intent to sell or distribute remains unproven. This significant judgment provides legal protection for healthcare professionals stocking medicines for patient care.
