![[Christian Prayer Meet] SC Permits to Hold the Prayer Meeting in Indore, Set Aside MP HC Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
NEW DELHI: Today (10th April): The Supreme Court of India intervened in a dispute over a Christian prayer event in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, allowing the event to proceed despite concerns raised by the district administration and Hindu organizations. Chennai-based preacher Dr. Paul Dhinakaran addressed 8,000 attendees at the event. The court recognized the religious intent but also considered the administration’s concerns.
Today (10th April): The Supreme Court stayed the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order restricting Bar Association office bearers from appearing before any court for one month. The Court emphasized the importance of responsible conduct among lawyers. This decision provides temporary relief and the matter will be further examined during the proceedings.
A Delhi court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for flawed investigation in a money laundering case. The court summoned the Investigating Officer to explain why penal and disciplinary action should not be recommended. Special Judge Farrukh noted the failure to conduct a fair investigation, as crucial evidence was withheld. The court issued notices for the individuals implicated in the illegal activities.
Today (27th March) A formal complaint has been lodged with the Delhi High Court against Aam Aadmi Party’s legal cell for organizing protests within court premises following Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest. Advocate Vaibhav Singh seeks to halt the demonstrations and urges investigation into potential professional misconduct by the Bar Councils of India and Delhi. The complaint specifically targets the AAP’s Legal Cell’s Vice-Chairman, Sanjiv Nasiar, for making false allegations and using court spaces for political purposes, calling for appropriate penalties.
Today (13th March): The Bombay High Court upheld a penalty on a CISF officer for a late-night request for a lemon at a woman’s door, deeming his actions preposterous and unbecoming of an officer. The officer’s claim of a medical emergency was dismissed, and the penalty includes a salary reduction and freeze on increments for three years.