The Supreme Court of India dismissed today a PIL petition from the Sikh Chamber of Commerce, citing an absence of a compelling case and reiterating their previous judgment on EVMs and VVPAT. Justices Khanna and Datta emphasized that polling officers cannot discern voters’ choices from VVPAT slips, addressing concerns about voter secrecy in Indian elections.
Today (17th May): The Supreme Court rejects an appeal challenging the Karnataka High Court’s order to stay proceedings against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya, accused of objectionable tweets and violating the Model Code of Conduct before the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Justices questioned bypassing the High Court, leading the petitioners to withdraw the plea. Another case involves Union Minister Shobha Karandlaje.
The Supreme Court is set to hear Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against possible arrest on Monday, April 29th. The plea is related to a defamation case filed by a former DDA vice-chairman. Kejriwal argues that his arrest undermines democracy and accuses the ED of misusing its power for political purposes. The controversy centers on alleged corruption in Delhi’s excise policy.
The Supreme Court allowed the Income Tax department to reassess Environics Trust’s income, stemming from allegations of orchestrating protests. No final orders will be issued yet. The court directed the NGO to cooperate with the investigation. The department alleged that the trust’s activities hinder Indian projects and receive most income from foreign sources.
Today, 10th April, The Supreme Court’s recent ruling prioritizes testimonies from relatives in dowry death cases, underscoring the importance of considering their accounts despite potential bias. This decision aims to ensure fair justice and accountability. The Supreme Court (SC) ordered a new trial for a husband accused of dowry death, stressing the need for proper due process and fair treatment.
The Supreme Court of India Yesterday (March 12th), highlighted the importance of renovating historical monuments, citing the successful restoration projects at Sunder Nursery and Humayun’s Tomb in Delhi by the Archaeological Survey of India. The court emphasized the delicate balance between preservation and improvement, acknowledging the necessity and positive outcomes of appropriate renovation work, while ensuring that the fundamental characteristics of the monuments are not altered. This nuanced approach reflects the complexities involved in maintaining and enhancing heritage sites.
The Supreme Court of India, under the leadership of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, initiated a critical examination of the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) on January 9. This landmark case is being scrutinized by a seven-judge bench, including Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra, and SC Sharma. The […]
A Landmark Case on Educational Rights and Minority Protections The Supreme Court of India is poised to undertake a pivotal constitutional examination regarding the minority status of educational institutions, a matter that has garnered significant attention due to its implications on educational rights and minority protections in India. The focus of this examination is the […]
The Supreme Court of India has directed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by the Uttar Pradesh government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into allegations of corruption in land compensation distribution by the Noida Authority over the past 15 years. This directive follows the court’s dissatisfaction with the initial report submitted by the SIT, which […]
On the occasion of Gandhi Jayanti, Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, emphasized the importance of not only maintaining a clean physical environment but also striving for a “cleaner, more transparent, and accountable legal system.” His message, resonating with the principles of Mahatma Gandhi, was read out during the celebrations held at the Supreme Court […]
