![[Hate Speech Case] HC Temporarily Stays Criminal Proceedings Against Former Union Minister Basanagoudar Patil Yatnal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-9.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Karnataka High Court temporarily stayed all criminal proceedings against Basanagoudar Patil Yatnal, a former Union Minister and BJP leader, related to a 2022 hate speech case. Yatnal’s remarks, perceived as inciting communal tension, drew public outrage and legal action, but he claims the allegations are politically motivated. The court’s stay offers him temporary relief.
A Mumbai resident filed a petition in the Bombay High Court seeking action against Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde and BJP leader Nitesh Rane for alleged anti-Muslim remarks. The plea calls for halting live broadcasts of Rane’s rallies, prosecuting him and Shinde for hate speech, and ensuring police accountability.
Today(6th September), The Supreme Court stayed a Madras High Court order requiring YouTuber G Felix Gerald to shut down his channel ‘RED PIX 24×7’ as a bail condition. This directive was previously imposed due to his arrest for airing an interview with derogatory remarks about women police personnel.
![[Derogatory Remarks on Women Police Officers] "Delays in The High Court Can't Be The Reason For Us to Intervene Here": CJI on 17 FIR's Against YouTuber Savukku Shankar](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-82-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 30th August, The Chief Justice of India is set to hear a case against YouTuber Savukku Shankar for making derogatory remarks about women police officers. Shankar faces multiple FIRs for his comments, leading to legal actions and repeated detentions. The Supreme Court has intervened, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual liberties and free speech against misuse of preventive detention laws.
The Supreme Court has granted anticipatory bail today to Shajan Skaria, the editor of ‘Marunadan Malayalee,’ in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The case involves alleged derogatory remarks made against MLA PV Sreenijin. The Court’s ruling sets aside earlier denials of anticipatory bail and directs release on bail if arrested. The complainant may pursue a defamation lawsuit.
The Supreme Court today directed the UP Government to secure a sponsor to cover the educational expenses for a Muslim child from Muzaffarnagar who was assaulted. The state must ensure the child remains in the same school until the completion of his schooling. This directive stems from a petition filed by Tushar Gandhi seeking justice for the mistreated student.
![[Defamation Case] Rahul Gandhi Fails Court Appearance Over Modi Surname & Amit Shah Remarks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-18-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition, faces legal challenges with two cases filed against him for derogatory remarks about the Modi surname and comments about former BJP president Amit Shah. He has failed to appear in court for scheduled hearings, prompting requests for a warrant and garnering significant media attention for its potential impact on the political landscape in India.
![[Savukku Shankar Interview Case] Madras HC Refuses Bail to YouTuber G Felix Gerald](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-52-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th June, The Madras High Court denied bail to YouTuber G Felix Gerald, charged for facilitating derogatory comments about women in an interview with YouTuber Savukku Shankar. The judge criticized the failure to remove offensive remarks from the interview. Both individuals faced complaints, with Shankar placed in judicial custody.
![[Breaking] Activist Medha Patkar Gets 5 Months Jail in Defamation Case by LG VK Saxena](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-49.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, Medha Patkar convicted in a defamation case filed by VK Saxena for making defamatory statements. The ruling holds legal implications, as she faces up to two years in jail or a fine. This marks a significant development in their long-standing legal dispute. Additionally, Patkar faces charges of fraud in a separate case.