Today, On 1st April, The Supreme Court bench, led by Justice AS Oka and Justice Bhuyan, condemned the Uttar Pradesh government for demolishing the homes of a lawyer, a professor, and others without following proper legal procedures. The bench cited a distressing video of a girl fleeing with books, highlighting the widespread disturbance caused by the demolitions. They emphasized the failure to adhere to the law in such actions, criticizing the lack of due process. The court’s remarks the importance of safeguarding citizens’ rights against arbitrary actions.
Today, On 24th March, The Bombay High Court issued a stay on the demolition of houses belonging to two individuals accused in the Nagpur violence case. Criticizing the administration’s approach, the court termed it “high-handed.” Meanwhile, amid tight police security, civic authorities proceeded with the demolition of accused Fahim Khan’s house, citing unauthorized construction.
Today, On 20th March, The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a plea challenging the DDA’s demolition of temples in Mayur Vihar, Delhi. Petitioners argued that the demolition violated constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 25 and was done without a proper hearing. They accused the DDA of acting arbitrarily, disregarding previous court judgments. The court, however, declined to intervene, reinforcing the need for legal compliance in land use.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday, 3rd March, refused to entertain a petition seeking contempt action against Gujarat authorities for allegedly disobeying its orders regarding demolition of properties. The petitioner alleged that authorities in Ahmedabad demolished houses without following the Supreme Court’s directions.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday (31st Jan) denied a request to allow the “Urs” festival to take place from February 1 to February 3 at a demolished dargah in Gujarat’s Gir Somnath district. A bench consisting of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih heard arguments, including submissions from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Gujarat government. Mehta explained that all illegal constructions on the land, including temples, had been demolished.
The Supreme Court Today (Jan 24) scheduled a hearing next week on a plea accusing Sambhal authorities of violating its guidelines by demolishing part of Mohammed Ghayoor’s property without notice. This case challenges the court’s prior directive to prevent unauthorized demolitions, potentially reshaping how such cases are addressed in the future.
The Supreme Court on Monday (6th Jan) declined to hear a petition challenging Ashwani Kumar’s appointment as Administrator of the Delhi Waqf Board. The petitioner argues that Kumar unlawfully occupies the position post the Board’s term expiration in August 2023, and claims conflicts of interest exist due to his previous demolition recommendations of historical Waqf properties.
The controversy over allegations of demolishing a Lord Hanuman temple at the residence of the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken a significant turn. The High Court Registrar General has strongly refuted these claims, calling them misleading and baseless. This statement aims to clarify the misinformation surrounding the issue. The matter continues to stir public interest and debate.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association has written a letter to the President, Prime Minister, and Chief Justice of India, protesting the removal of a Hanuman temple from Justice Kait’s official residence. The association feels that this action disrespects religious beliefs and has asked for intervention. They are requesting that necessary steps be taken to resolve the issue.