The Supreme Court of India upheld the classification of medical devices as “drugs,” aligning with international standards and prioritizing patient safety. The decision dismissed a petition challenging the government’s categorization, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight. This ruling sets a precedent, ensuring stringent regulatory measures for medical devices and emphasizing patient welfare.
The Supreme Court clarified that an accused cannot claim default bail solely due to ongoing investigations or an incomplete charge sheet. This decision revoked bail for ex-DHFL promoters in a bank loan fraud case. The ruling impacts criminal cases and upholds the right to default bail only until a charge sheet is filed. This landmark case sets a new precedent in Indian law.
The Delhi High Court emphasized that being a judicial officer does not mean relinquishing fundamental rights, especially in personal matters. In a case involving deception, the court denied bail to the accused’s associate and criticized attempts to exploit the system due to the victim’s relation to a judicial officer. It also issued a directive to protect the identity of victims in sexual offence cases.
The Delhi High Court reaffirmed the Hindu Marriage Act’s boundaries on marriage partner choice, specifically prohibiting sapinda marriages. The ruling responded to a plea challenging the Act’s validity after a marriage to a distant cousin was annulled. The court upheld the Act, emphasizing the need for proof of custom for exceptions and the balance between individual choice and societal norms.
Rahul Gandhi faced legal action for disclosing the identity of a rape and murder victim, which sparked widespread outrage. The Delhi High Court prompted him to remove the controversial social media post and an FIR was registered against him. This case emphasizes the crucial need to protect the privacy of minor victims, particularly in the age of social media.
The Supreme Court overturned the default bail granted to DHFL promoters Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan in a multi-crore loan scam case. The decision, following an appeal by the CBI, clarifies the statutory right of default bail and marks a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings. The full judgment is awaited. (Word count: 50)
The Delhi High Court has overturned the Central Information Commission’s order directing the Income Tax Department to disclose PM CARES Fund information under the Right to Information Act. The court emphasized the confidentiality of taxpayer information and the necessity of the Fund’s involvement in the decision. This ruling has raised questions about the Fund’s transparency and accountability.
The Supreme Court intervened in the Kheda flogging case, staying contempt proceedings against four Gujarat police officers who had been sentenced to 14 days’ imprisonment for their involvement in public flogging of Muslim men. The officers appealed the verdict, arguing jurisdictional issues, sparking strong disapproval from the Supreme Court bench. The case raises concerns about police conduct and custodial torture enforcement in India.
The Delhi High Court, led by Justice Subramonium Prasad, reversed its decision allowing a woman to terminate her 29-week pregnancy due to severe emotional distress following her husband’s death. The Central Government’s challenge led to a recall of the initial ruling, highlighting the complex legal, ethical, and medical considerations in late-term pregnancy termination cases.
Cine1 Studios and T-Series have settled their legal dispute over the movie “Animal,” allowing its release on OTT platforms. The agreement, confirmed in Delhi High Court, resolves allegations of contractual breaches and clears the way for the film’s digital premiere. The settlement marks a significant development in the much-anticipated release of “Animal” starring Ranbir Kapoor.