![#BREAKING [Delhi Excise Policy Case] SC Extented Interim Bail of Businessman Abhishek Boinpally](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-19-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
NEW DELHI: Today (18th April): The Supreme Court extended businessman Abhishek Boinpally’s interim bail in the Delhi excise policy case until May 8. Boinpally, facing trial in the case, was granted bail in consideration of health issues during his incarceration. The Enforcement Directorate did not oppose the extension, and his plea for regular bail will be considered on May 8.
New Delhi: A PIL filed in Delhi HC seeks suitable facilities for CM Arvind Kejriwal in Tihar Jail, emphasizing his role as an elected leader. It requests video conferencing for governance from custody. Background: Kejriwal’s arrest on March 21, subsequent remand on April 1, and concerns about media interference and demands for his resignation. Previous petitions to remove him were rejected or fined.
Today, 16th April,Delhi court directs ED to respond to Arvind Kejriwal’s plea for medical consultation via video conference. Kejriwal’s counsel cited low blood sugar levels as reason for request. ED argues medical facilities are available in jail. Kejriwal is in judicial custody until April 23 in money laundering case related to liquor policy. Delhi Court dismissed his plea against arrest by ED. Kejriwal claims innocence in money laundering case.
Today(on 15th April), Delhi court postpones Manish Sisodia’s bail hearing for the fourth time. Advocate argues for his prolonged incarceration. Central Bureau of Investigation accuses Sisodia of being the mastermind behind the alleged Delhi Excise scam. Enforcement Directorate claims Sisodia participated in the destruction of evidence. Sisodia seeks interim bail to campaign for Aam Aadmi Party during the Lok Sabha polls.
Today,11th April, K Kavitha, a BRS leader, approached Rouse Avenue Court requesting documentation of her arrest by the CBI in the Delhi Excise Policy case. The duty judge postponed the review to the next day due to a lack of case records. The court ordered the application to be presented before the relevant special court on April 12 at 10 am for further review.
NEW DELHI: Today (9th April): The Delhi High Court rejected Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a liquor case, deeming it valid. The court found sufficient evidence of hawala transactions and statements, dismissing his claims of political motivation. The decision sets a precedent for accountability of public officials.
![[BREAKING] K Kavitha Bail Plea | Delhi HC Seeks ED Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=447%2C360&ssl=1)
K. Kavitha, a prominent political figure, has been denied interim bail in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case. She is accused of involvement in a bribery scheme and tampering with evidence. The Enforcement Directorate opposes her bail plea, citing potential influence on the case, witness tampering, and evidence destruction. Kavitha’s legal team emphasizes the need for emotional support for her son during exams.
Today ( 6th April) A complaint has been filed against Sunita Kejriwal and other leaders for sharing court proceedings on social media, violating Video Conferencing Rules. The complaint alleges a planned conspiracy to manipulate court proceedings and mislead the public. It also targets Aam Aadmi Party members and opposition parties for sharing the recordings.
Manish Sisodia’s bail plea for the Delhi Excise Policy case was heard at Rouse Avenue Court. The former Deputy CM’s counsel argued against alleged financial losses and prolonged trial delays. The next hearing is scheduled for April 6. This unfolds amidst investigations by the ED and CBI, notably entangling Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
On 27th March: The Delhi court has granted an early hearing for Manish Sisodia’s bail plea in the Delhi Excise Policy case, setting it for April 2, 2024, instead of the previously scheduled April 4. The bail plea is contested due to potential flight risk and tampering with evidence concerns, with the trial’s delay also factoring in.