A PIL has been filed in the Delhi High Court calling for a “high-level” investigation into the deaths of three civil service aspirants caused by severe water-logging at a coaching center in Rajendra Nagar. The case, presented by Advocate Rudra Vikram Singh, will be heard by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.
Today, On 25th July, The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Development Authority to fence off the Yamuna river’s floodplain post removal of encroachments to prevent illegal constructions. The court emphasized the use of technology for monitoring, declined the formation of a special task force, and instructed the protection of the area. Various related directives were also issued.
Today, On 25th July, A Supreme Court Bench, led by Justice BR Gavai, criticized another Bench for hearing the DDA tree felling case, emphasizing the importance of judicial propriety. The matter has been referred to the Chief Justice of India to ensure proper listing before a single Bench, aiming to prevent conflicting orders and maintain clarity in proceedings.
Today, On 17th July, The Supreme Court criticized the Delhi government for allowing the removal of 422 trees without statutory power, emphasizing environmental concerns. It demanded an explanation and action taken report, expressing frustration over the lack of sensitivity and a perceived cover-up. The court also directed the government to take preventive measures and ensure proper infrastructure for environmental protection.
Today(on 10th July),The Supreme Court issued a notice to the Delhi Police following a petition alleging harassment for legal action against the DDA over unauthorized tree felling in the Ridge area. The case, rooted in a Suo motu contempt against the DDA Vice Chairman, also questions the involvement of Delhi LG VK Saxena.
Today(on 26th June), The Supreme Court of India strongly criticized the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Delhi government for illegal tree cutting in the ridge area, an extension of the Aravallis. The court ordered criminal action against responsible DDA officials, emphasizing serious environmental concerns and labeling the government’s oversight as a significant lapse.
Today, On 24th June, The Supreme Court issued contempt notices to Delhi Development Authority (DDA) officials for unauthorized tree cutting, stressing the need to protect the environment. The court plans a thorough investigation and a large tree plantation initiative in Delhi. Earlier, a contempt notice was issued to the DDA Vice-Chairman for extensive tree cutting. Next hearing scheduled for June 26.
The Delhi High Court instructed the DDA to develop comprehensive SOPs for booking Ramleela sites within five weeks, aiming to ensure transparency and fairness. This comes after petitions raised concerns about irregularities in the current process. The court has also prohibited new bookings until the new guidelines are established. The aim is to maintain the integrity of this tradition.
The Delhi High Court found Uday Pal Singh guilty of criminal contempt for making defamatory accusations against judges in a social media video. Singh accused the judges of favoring the Delhi Development Authority and engaging in illegal activities. Despite Singh’s apology, the Court did not accept his explanation and has scheduled a further hearing.
Today(on 16th May),The Supreme Court ordered Delhi and three other states to cease new mining permissions in the Aravalli range without its approval, and has also rebuked the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for unauthorized tree cutting in the Ridge area, an extension of the Aravallis.
