Today, On 28th May, The Supreme Court described the Delhi Ridge tree-cutting issue as “a case of institutional missteps and administrative overreach,” while letting the Delhi LG and DDA off the hook in the contempt case, citing broader public welfare considerations.
NEW DELHI: A land dispute case that has been pending for 66 years has finally been decided by a city court in New Delhi. The original parties involved in the case have long passed away, but the case was still being heard until recently. The court ruled that the case was not maintainable in its present form, meaning it could not continue in the way it had been filed.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) told the Supreme Court that the structures in Mehrauli Archaeological Park have religious importance. ASI’s statement emphasizes that these structures are an important part of India’s history and culture. The park has many monuments, some of which are believed to have religious value.
The Supreme Court today (23rd Oct) has sought an affidavit from Delhi’s Lieutenant Governor V.K. Saxena regarding alleged illegal tree felling for the CAPFIMS project. Saxena stated he was unaware that court permission was needed, citing prior approvals from the Delhi government. He emphasized that officials may have misinterpreted these approvals, acting in good faith.
![[DDA Land Encroachment Case] The Prosecution Successfully Proved The Charges Against The Appellant": Delhi HC Suspends Sentence of Ex-Congress MLA Asif Mohd. Khan](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-29-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 9th September, The Delhi High Court suspended former Congress MLA Asif Mohammad Khan’s six-month sentence for encroaching on Delhi Development Authority (DDA) land. Khan must deposit Rs.2 lakh, part of the Rs.5 lakh compensation owed to the DDA. The High Court also summoned the DDA for a response, after Khan’s appeal against his conviction was dismissed by the Saket Court.
![[Mayur Vihar Tragedy] "They Think Doing Work is a Crime": HC Criticizes MCD Over Death of Woman & Child in Waterlogged Drain](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/shared-image-4-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th August, The Delhi High Court criticized the Municipal Corporation of Delhi for negligence after a tragic incident of a mother and son falling into an open drain. The court demanded video evidence, questioned jurisdictional issues, and scrutinized the lack of maintenance and oversight, prompting the need for immediate actions to prevent further tragedies.
Today, On 17th July, The Supreme Court criticized the Delhi government for allowing the removal of 422 trees without statutory power, emphasizing environmental concerns. It demanded an explanation and action taken report, expressing frustration over the lack of sensitivity and a perceived cover-up. The court also directed the government to take preventive measures and ensure proper infrastructure for environmental protection.
Today, On 10th May, the Delhi High Court ordered the closure of coaching centers violating safety regulations, aiming to ensure student and resident safety. The MCD and DDA were directed to seal non-compliant premises. The court emphasized the importance of fire safety and instructed authorities to conduct a survey to identify non-compliant coaching centers within four weeks.
On 30th April: The Delhi High Court expressed concern about unauthorized constructions on Waqf properties, highlighting the lack of oversight. It emphasized the need for effective monitoring. The court discussed a specific case in Nizamuddin East and questioned the authorities about the ongoing dispute between the Waqf Board and the Delhi Development Authority. There are also concerns about the administrator’s actions.
Today, 30th April, The Delhi High Court exposed illegal constructions on Waqf properties, urging urgent action for safeguarding their sanctity. The court criticized mismanagement and unauthorized construction amidst disputes between the Waqf Board and the Delhi Development Authority. It also highlighted concerns regarding the administrator’s role and recommended actions, awaiting further hearings on May 8.