A Delhi court Today (April 21) extended the stay on investigating Law Minister Kapil Mishra’s alleged role in the 2020 Delhi riots. The extension was granted as court notices couldn’t be served to all parties.
A Delhi court rejected BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan’s plea to prosecute AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj over alleged defamation in 2018. The court cited an expired limitation period and noted the delay in filing the complaint. It criticized Chauhan’s approach as whimsical and opportunistic. As a result, the case was dismissed.
New Delhi, March 27: The Delhi High Court has agreed to examine a petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Somnath Bharti. In his plea, Bharti has challenged the election victory of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) candidate Satish Upadhyay from the Malviya Nagar constituency in the recently held Delhi Assembly elections.
A Delhi court criticized BJP leader Kapil Mishra for using the word “Pakistan” to spread hatred during his election campaign. The court refused to cancel the summons issued against him in an electoral malpractice case. It also condemned the use of communal speeches to influence voters. The ruling emphasized the need for fair and unbiased campaigning.
Today, On 5th February, Former Chief Justice of India, Chandrachud, urged citizens to actively participate in the democratic process during the Delhi elections. After casting his vote, he emphasized that every election is crucial in shaping democracy. He encouraged young voters and all citizens to exercise their right to vote. His statement highlights the responsibility of individuals in reinforcing democratic values.
Before the Delhi elections, Arvind Kejriwal got a case against him for saying Haryana is “poisoning” Yamuna’s water. This increased political tension as the AAP leader faces legal trouble. His statement created controversy, and opponents criticized him. This happens while Delhi’s election fight is getting intense. A day before the Delhi Assembly elections, Arvind Kejriwal, […]
Today, On 3rd February, The Delhi High Court declined an urgent hearing on a PIL filed by a retired judge challenging cash-based schemes by political parties. The petition raises concerns over the impact of such schemes on fair elections. The court did not find immediate grounds for urgency. The matter will be considered in due course.