Dilsukhnagar Twin Blast Case || Telangana HC Upholds Death Penalty for Five Convicts

Today, On 8th April, The Telangana High Court has upheld the death sentences of five Indian Mujahideen operatives convicted in the 2013 Dilsukhnagar twin bomb blasts, which killed 18 people and injured over 100. The court affirmed the NIA Special Court’s 2016 verdict, citing the heinous and premeditated nature of the attack. The convicts were found guilty under IPC Section 302, UAPA, and the Explosive Substances Act.

ANALYSIS| ‘There Can’t Be Moral Conviction In Law’: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence (Sanjay v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2025 INSC 317)

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction and death sentence of a man accused of raping and murdering a four-year-old girl, citing insufficient evidence beyond the last-seen theory.

1984 Riots Case | ‘Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied’: Sikh Community Demands Death Penalty for Ex-MP Sajjan Kumar

Today, On 25th February, Before Sajjan Kumar’s sentencing in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, some Sikh community members have demanded the death penalty for him. They argue that the crime, involving murder and large-scale violence, qualifies as a ‘rarest of the rare’ case. According to them, he deserves the maximum punishment under the law.

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Case: Prosecution Seeks Death Penalty for Former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar

New Delhi: The prosecution demanded the death penalty for former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case. The case involves the killing of a father and son in the Saraswati Vihar area in November 1984. The public prosecutor is set to submit his written arguments in court. He is urging the court to impose the death penalty based on the guidelines established in the Nirbhaya case and other similar cases.

Kolkata Court Sentenced Man to Death for Killing Wife and Daughter

Jalpaiguri, West Bengal: A man has been given the death penalty for brutally murdering his wife and 18-month-old daughter. The incident took place in Nagrakata, Jalpaiguri district, and the verdict was announced by the Jalpaiguri Sessions Court on Tuesday.

Calcutta High Court Admits Appeal in Death Sentence for Girl’s Rape-Murder Case

KOLKATA: The Calcutta High Court has accepted an appeal against the death penalty given by a POCSO court to a man convicted of raping and murdering a 10-year-old girl in West Bengal’s South 24 Parganas district. This appeal was filed by the convict, Mostakin Sardar, and will now be reviewed by a division bench of the High Court.

[BREAKING] RG Kar Rape | Calcutta HC Reserves Judgement on Appeals by State & CBI Seeking Death Penalty for Sanjay Roy

The Calcutta High Court Today (Jan 27) reserved its judgment on appeals from the West Bengal government and CBI, both demanding the death penalty for Sanjay Roy, convicted of raping and murdering a 31-year-old doctor at Kolkata’s RG Kar College and Hospital. Both parties argue that the life imprisonment sentence handed down by the Sealdah Sessions Court is inadequate, emphasizing the state’s and CBI’s shared pursuit of justice.

RG Kar Rape | Calcutta HC Begins Hearing Of Twin Appeals For Death Penalty To Sanjay Roy By Bengal Govt, CBI

The Calcutta High Court Today (Jan 27) began hearing appeals from the West Bengal government and the CBI against the life imprisonment sentence given to Sanjay Roy in the RG Kar hospital rape-murder case. Both parties argue the punishment is too lenient and are demanding the death penalty. The CBI emphasized its right to challenge the sentence as the investigation agency, while the state government asserted its authority to appeal the trial court’s judgment.

Centre Informs Supreme Court: ‘Swamy Shraddananda Seeking Direction To the President To Decide Mercy Plea’

Today, On 24th January, The Centre informed the Supreme Court that Shraddananda is seeking a direction for the President to decide on his mercy plea. The plea is related to his conviction, and the petitioner is requesting the President’s intervention. The Centre explained this during a virtual hearing in the apex court. The Court will now consider the matter for further proceedings.